strangeguy
03-31-2007, 05:08 PM
Hi,
I am a guy who has just discovered that I have a little strange variation of what is normally a non-BDSM fetish. This little thing is perfectly legal but it plays with extremely intense cultural taboos and human weaknesses in such a way that it (even unintentionally) seems to cause a dominant/submissive relationship between me (dominant) and the female (submissive). It also leaves the female feel very objectified.
I am a little shy to tell exactly what it is, since even if I am pretty sure that it would not violate the rules from an objective standpoint, it could cause offense and I am not interested in being banned right away or have a flame war.
I tried to talk about it on a forum that deals with this non-BDSM fetish but since my variation of it seems to inflict some sort of dominant/submissive quality on the whole thing, the vanilla people on this other forum almost flamed me to death. Despite their own fetish being quite kinky, they could just not deal with my ideas, even if I tried to formulate them as politely as possible. Especially, feminists and PC-people got really nuts about it, so they started a holy flamewar against me. I wasn't banned because I did not violate the rules of that forum and the mods were friendly enough to admit it.
So, I guess that my first question is, is it OK to talk about violating cultural taboos regarding certain human weaknesses in such a way that it causes a dominant/submissive relationship on this site?
Some basic info about me: I am 30 years old, white male, live in Europe. My normal manners are nerdy, shy, and polite but because of my kinky little special interest, it seems like I am extremaly skilled in the art of causing extreme cultural shame (even in private) and some sort of submission on a certain group of females (it's not an ethnic/cultural group), due to a formal/clinical engineering approach and a large body of knowledge of certain human weaknesses. I believe that I can do this just by talking/typing in a way that is polite, non-judgemental, and friendly but it violates strong taboos and gauges normal human weakness thus causing submission and possibly also shame (not really my intention but I did not invent the taboos).
best friendly regards,
Strangeguy
I am a guy who has just discovered that I have a little strange variation of what is normally a non-BDSM fetish. This little thing is perfectly legal but it plays with extremely intense cultural taboos and human weaknesses in such a way that it (even unintentionally) seems to cause a dominant/submissive relationship between me (dominant) and the female (submissive). It also leaves the female feel very objectified.
I am a little shy to tell exactly what it is, since even if I am pretty sure that it would not violate the rules from an objective standpoint, it could cause offense and I am not interested in being banned right away or have a flame war.
I tried to talk about it on a forum that deals with this non-BDSM fetish but since my variation of it seems to inflict some sort of dominant/submissive quality on the whole thing, the vanilla people on this other forum almost flamed me to death. Despite their own fetish being quite kinky, they could just not deal with my ideas, even if I tried to formulate them as politely as possible. Especially, feminists and PC-people got really nuts about it, so they started a holy flamewar against me. I wasn't banned because I did not violate the rules of that forum and the mods were friendly enough to admit it.
So, I guess that my first question is, is it OK to talk about violating cultural taboos regarding certain human weaknesses in such a way that it causes a dominant/submissive relationship on this site?
Some basic info about me: I am 30 years old, white male, live in Europe. My normal manners are nerdy, shy, and polite but because of my kinky little special interest, it seems like I am extremaly skilled in the art of causing extreme cultural shame (even in private) and some sort of submission on a certain group of females (it's not an ethnic/cultural group), due to a formal/clinical engineering approach and a large body of knowledge of certain human weaknesses. I believe that I can do this just by talking/typing in a way that is polite, non-judgemental, and friendly but it violates strong taboos and gauges normal human weakness thus causing submission and possibly also shame (not really my intention but I did not invent the taboos).
best friendly regards,
Strangeguy