The joys of anal

Yes, it seemed kind of slow on here so I'm posting some new threads. ..

I don't know why, but I feel compelled to state for the record that I LOVE GETTING FUCKED IN THE ASS.

It is becoming my absolute favorite thing in the world. . .(well, after hugging my children. . .)

It makes me feel full. It makes me feel dominated, opened up, overpowered and more truly submissive than anything else. It makes me so aware of my body. Strangely enough, it makes me feel beautiful and feminine.

And,yes, I love that it always always begins for me with a little bit of fear and some measure of discomfort--I have to completely relax completely trust completely submit to overcome that discomfort.

I love that all the men (just three) who have fucked me in the ass have loved it so much. I always ask why and I love the answers they have given me: "because it is so tight." "because it is so naughty and dirty and forbidden." " because I love your ass." and once, even, "because it hurts you a little and you are willing to feel plain for my pleasure." (see my "I love sadism" thread).

But I'm torn: one of the things I've loved about being sodomized is thinking of myself as unusual, out-there, adventurous for being a woman who asks for this (the other night I nearly begged) regularly. Will the fun of it fade as it goes mainstream? Or will there just be a lot more happy and fulfilled people walking around?

And has anyone read Toni Bentley's Surrender? Should I? Is there something in there I don't already know--because I already believe that if there is a god, taking it up the ass does bring you closer to him.

Finding a slave is hard one willing to be fucked up the ass is harded. As for why I love fucking a slave up the ass it is the smae for the pussy and mouth. Oh on the mouth I am not talking about her giving me head but fucking her in the mouth. It is pleasher.

I would say my interest in anal is at least partly fueled by it's taboo status. It's similar to the fascination with oral sex. They were a big turn-on until they started to become more of a regular foreplay, though I guess whether swallowing has lost it's taboo is debatable. If it got to a point where one could walk down a high school hallway and hear common talks of anal sex acts, then I think I"d have to move on to something further out of the mainstream. (Maybe that SM stuff you mentioned?) Just a psychological issue that I can't be the same as the rest. Another part of it, maybe stemming from the taboo idea, is the amount of trust and giving up of control that it involves.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by allalone46

Finding a slave is hard one willing to be fucked up the ass is harded. As for why I love fucking a slave up the ass it is the smae for the pussy and mouth. Oh on the mouth I am not talking about her giving me head but fucking her in the mouth. It is pleasher.

---

Hmmmnn. . .interesting distinction you make between "her giving me head" and "fucking her in the mouth," AllAlone.

I, too, think there is a big difference. . .I've never really loved giving blow jobs--I used to spend all my time worrying about him coming in my mouth and it also makes my jaw sore. (I still do it for him, though.)

But we've changed things a bit--sometimes, anyway--I lie back with my head over the edge of the bed, he fucks me in the mouth, he's now free to come there --begged to come there, actually, and I love receiving it and swallowing it--the whole thing has become much more pleasurable for me.

Giving blow jobs is so. . .ordinary, and it's hard work. But getting fucked in the mouth--now that's submissive slut pleasure!

Glad to hear there are dom men out there who enjoy fucking their sub's mouths as much or more than receiving blow jobs.

How important is it to you that she swallows?

--SP

Well thee is a difference. Hveing a woman giving me head is one thing but a slave shood be fucked in her mouth. Sex for her is to please her Master. In this she acheves her pleasure. Not in pleasing her self instead of her Master. Oh she has to swallow all her Masters cum. And if there are two or more slaves they have to eat there Maasters cum out of the other slaves other holes when finished. That is both hoes.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by scandalous pleasure

Yes, it seemed kind of slow on here so I'm posting some new threads. ..

I don't know why, but I feel compelled to state for the record that I LOVE GETTING FUCKED IN THE ASS.

---

But what if his cock is in your mouth after he fucked your ass? There is a "taste" issue, unless you rinse your inside before the intercourse.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RhondaLee

But what if his cock is in your mouth after he fucked your ass? There is a "taste" issue, unless you rinse your inside before the intercourse.

---

That one of the resons why a slave keeps her self clened out in both holes. And yes I would also fuck my lsave in the ass than have her clean my cock off in her mouth after.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by allalone46

That one of the resons why a slave keeps her self clened out in both holes. And yes I would also fuck my lsave in the ass than have her clean my cock off in her mouth after.

---

Ass to mouth is very very unsafe. It's a great way of catching all sorts of bacteria, parasites, etc.

We don't do that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by scandalous pleasure

Ass to mouth is very very unsafe. It's a great way of catching all sorts of bacteria, parasites, etc.

We don't do that.

---

Yes it is, and nothing is foolproof, and that is also why I stated that the slaveneeds to keep herself cleaned out with enamas. And before plave and as part of it the first thing would be to do a though cleaning of the slaves holes. All holes.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by scandalous pleasure

Yes, it seemed kind of slow on here so I'm posting some new threads. ..

I don't know why, but I feel compelled to state for the record that I LOVE GETTING FUCKED IN THE ASS.

It is becoming my absolute favorite thing in the world. . .(well, after hugging my children. . .)

It makes me feel full. It makes me feel dominated, opened up, overpowered and more truly submissive than anything else. It makes me so aware of my body. Strangely enough, it makes me feel beautiful and feminine.

And,yes, I love that it always always begins for me with a little bit of fear and some measure of discomfort--I have to completely relax completely trust completely submit to overcome that discomfort.

I love that all the men (just three) who have fucked me in the ass have loved it so much. I always ask why and I love the answers they have given me: "because it is so tight." "because it is so naughty and dirty and forbidden." " because I love your ass." and once, even, "because it hurts you a little and you are willing to feel plain for my pleasure." (see my "I love sadism" thread).

But I'm torn: one of the things I've loved about being sodomized is thinking of myself as unusual, out-there, adventurous for being a woman who asks for this (the other night I nearly begged) regularly. Will the fun of it fade as it goes mainstream? Or will there just be a lot more happy and fulfilled people walking around?

And has anyone read Toni Bentley's Surrender? Should I? Is there something in there I don't already know--because I already believe that if there is a god, taking it up the ass does bring you closer to him.

---

I love to have anal sex with women because it's tight, because it's "forbidden", and yes, because it hurts her, but she's willing to put up with it anyway. And for another reason too - the grunts girls make as they are being sodomised. I think sound has a lot to do with my pleasure with anal sex, and bdsm sex in general. Who doesn't like the sound of a whip striking flesh?

Good thread Scandolous.

I'm rather fond of anal sex myself. I think it's something only to be done occasionally, but it is a nice treat when my partner and I do it.

And, I thought I'd offer another perspective to this thread. I love taking it up the ass. Now for the record, I am straight, and when I say "it" I mean a toy being weilded by my Domme. It stimulates my prostate, feels damn good, and it's a good and fun way for me to submit to her. Again, I don't do this often, I don't want to mess anything up down there, and I am still pretty inexperienced, so it takes a little bit of coaxing to get started. But, once it gets going, I lose the ability to talk, and make intelligent thought processes. :D

I'm a bit nervous admitting this, since it has quite a stigma attached to it, but hey, this is one of the most open minded places I know.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by scandalous pleasure

It makes me feel full. It makes me feel dominated, opened up, overpowered and more truly submissive than anything else. It makes me so aware of my body. Strangely enough, it makes me feel beautiful and feminine.

And,yes, I love that it always always begins for me with a little bit of fear and some measure of discomfort--I have to completely relax completely trust completely submit to overcome that discomfort.

---

I have to agree with you on so many points here. This is one of the few times where I willingly want to be dominated, there is no better way of enjoying anal sex than if you are being dominated and pulled deep onto your partners penis and having your hair and head pulled back.

It stimulates your vagina from a rare angle that feels great, as well as allowing your vagina to open up not only from your position but even more so as you get aroused and wetter and wetter, making your vagina desperate to be filled and allowing your clit to swell the more you get turned on. Not to mention that the position can leave your clit open to easy access and manual stimulation, your breasts can either drop and bounce or if you lean back sit proud and perky - looking great either way ;)

So yeah I'm with you on this one anal sex feels great and strangely enough does make you feel very feminine. I don't know about whether the fact that it's supposedly taboo that adds a little spice to it, but I don't think I would want to do it on a regular basis; I like to keep it as a special treat for both of us, plus the fact that I like having full control of my colon and bowel movements. :(

Dear Scandalous (Pleasure),

Being sodomized for a girl (in terms of her receptive feelings) might not differ substantially from a boy's receptive feelings when being sodomized, but ... beyond the "internal tactiles" (sodomizing partner's arched erection inserted "with" the rectum's "curve" [girls and boys on their backs] and arched erection inserted "against" the internal "curve" [girls and boys on "all fours" or some variant]), I believe there might be a very significant psycho- sexual feeling distinguishing girls' fulfillment from the act. Granted that both girls and boys experience submission (willing or otherwise), and granted that both experience a near requirement for focus on physical control of their respective sphincters, and even granted only the girl might receive physical pleasure (potential orgasm) from indirect stimulation of her "G-spot" (Granffenberg spot.), and further granted only the boy receives direct stimulation of his prostate. Granted all of these, it seems that only the girl (whose sexual organs offer side-by-side the penetrator two different apertures of substantially different pleasure) "compares" in her mind the distinctions between one "type" of penetration within her vis-a-vis the other different type.

And herein, in my view, lays part of her unique psycho-sexual comprehension of anal penetration. When she submits to sodomization she doesn't mere submit in a "role reversal" in the only manner possible as does a boy (oral intercourse aside as combining some sort of assertiveness by the "submitting" party). Quite the contrary, the girl submits regardless of whether her penetrators elects to "use" her vagina or her sphincter/rectum aperture and canal. For the girl then it would seem a matter of "election" between one or another submission rather than a role reversal, and in voluntarily submitting to anal penetration the girl's election would seem one of selfless self-denial (Perhaps it is part of the symbolism in "O" having been rendered so often a "0" [zero] by Sir Stephen.). In her self-reduction to zero the girl almost certainly comprehends that her unique ability to become pregnant (As well as that little "inducement", her clitoris!) are co-opted, indeed "relegated" to meaninglessness, as she offers herself in selfless and pure "sacrifice" to the male's pleasure and her penetrator's ultimate liberation to masturbate himself with her body's most intimate place without thought of any reciprocity. Indeed, "reciprocity" by sodomizer to the one submitted to sodomy, while not impossible, is without artifice and contortion a practical improbability. (Really, only in staged pornography does there seem to be the "rabid" and desparate manipulation of the submissive's clitoris ... as if such is actually supposed to facilitate "relaxation", or even more rediculously the simulated forced entry of unlubricated erections!)

Wherefore my postulate: that only the girl "elects" to deny her very being's "raisson d'etre"; that only the girl makes this "election" without substantially altering her sexual "role" and without employing role reversal; and that only the girl has a psycho-sexual realization of utter selfless self-denial and sex objectification almost entirely without a pleasureable inducement analogous to the boy's prostate. Herein then, if my postulate proves meritorious, lies a profound epiphany: in this one act, where her physical purpose remains the same without role reversal, the girl entirely reverses her purpose from generative being who "employs" males to objectified being who is "employed" by males. (It is a theory.)

Respectfully submitted,
... Marco. :)

Will there be a quiz on this?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Misanthrope

Will there be a quiz on this?

---

I sure hope not I haven't studied for it. ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jadetiger

I sure hope not I haven't studied for it. ;)

---

Me neither, but I suppose that is one form of homework I could get into.

More homework, I just graduated from college, I was hoping I would get a break.
Oh well, in the pursuit of education we must sacrifice!!

Dear Misanthrope,

>Will there be a quiz on this?

I wouldn't think so. The point of my inquiry is to inquire into the submissive's experience of emotional feelings and psychological drive to experience such feelings rather than concentrate solely on stating what is "done" to the submissive, how it "feels" (i.e. physical sensation as opposed to psychological perception), how the submissive "feels" (ditto), what the assertive partner "does", what the submissive "does" (or is restrained from doing), etc. If an inquiry into deep psychological feelings (the introspective place where one is alone in the dark of night) was misplaced here, I apologize.

Sincerely,
... Marco. :)

P.S. By way of analogy to my post, note that the authoress, Pauline Reage, of "Story of O" ("O" has her "fair share" of being sodomized!) devoted considerable portions of text to introspections of "O's" psychological feelings, perhaps even as much as what "O" might have docilely experienced being "done" to her, what she "does" (or "doesn't do"), and whatever searing descriptions of physical "feelings" "O" might have. I think such an inquiry (into deep psychological motives) does have merit from the standpoints of both submissive recipient and assertive penetrator. Consider for a moment "O's" "Sir Stephen": while "O's" psychology is copiously set forth (She muses quite often in her private moments ... "in the dark of the night" et al.), "Sir Stephen's" interior motives, conflicts, psychological drives & needs, become the great mystery of the story. The ambiguous end (Of the original story, not the less qualitatively brilliant sequel.) lends no clarity to "O's" central question: while she "did" what she "did" as her psychology demanded she "do" for love, did "Sir Stephen" love her (or not)? Isn't this as valid a question by analogy to the greater body of experiences (actual or theorized) that are posted here at "the Library"? Or, is it better we not concern ourselves with "why" when there is the exhiliaration of the "doing" to occupy our stimulus level and pain threshold?

Misanthrope & sm1277,
Yes we must all scarifice for the pursuit of knowledge. A little hands on experience may be a big help here in understanding the emotional feelings and psychological drive. Plus it could definately be fun. :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jadetiger

I sure hope not I haven't studied for it. ;)

---

Note to self: Oh God, she's gonna get in trouble again.

lol


her_Joe

:eek: Oh know you might be right. Damn my big mouth.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Marco

Dear Scandalous (Pleasure),

Being sodomized for a girl (in terms of her receptive feelings) might not differ substantially from a boy's receptive feelings when being sodomized, but ... beyond the "internal tactiles" (sodomizing partner's arched erection inserted "with" the rectum's "curve" [girls and boys on their backs] and arched erection inserted "against" the internal "curve" [girls and boys on "all fours" or some variant]), I believe there might be a very significant psycho- sexual feeling distinguishing girls' fulfillment from the act. Granted that both girls and boys experience submission (willing or otherwise), and granted that both experience a near requirement for focus on physical control of their respective sphincters, and even granted only the girl might receive physical pleasure (potential orgasm) from indirect stimulation of her "G-spot" (Granffenberg spot.), and further granted only the boy receives direct stimulation of his prostate. Granted all of these, it seems that only the girl (whose sexual organs offer side-by-side the penetrator two different apertures of substantially different pleasure) "compares" in her mind the distinctions between one "type" of penetration within her vis-a-vis the other different type.

And herein, in my view, lays part of her unique psycho-sexual comprehension of anal penetration. When she submits to sodomization she doesn't mere submit in a "role reversal" in the only manner possible as does a boy (oral intercourse aside as combining some sort of assertiveness by the "submitting" party). Quite the contrary, the girl submits regardless of whether her penetrators elects to "use" her vagina or her sphincter/rectum aperture and canal. For the girl then it would seem a matter of "election" between one or another submission rather than a role reversal, and in voluntarily submitting to anal penetration the girl's election would seem one of selfless self-denial (Perhaps it is part of the symbolism in "O" having been rendered so often a "0" [zero] by Sir Stephen.). In her self-reduction to zero the girl almost certainly comprehends that her unique ability to become pregnant (As well as that little "inducement", her clitoris!) are co-opted, indeed "relegated" to meaninglessness, as she offers herself in selfless and pure "sacrifice" to the male's pleasure and her penetrator's ultimate liberation to masturbate himself with her body's most intimate place without thought of any reciprocity. Indeed, "reciprocity" by sodomizer to the one submitted to sodomy, while not impossible, is without artifice and contortion a practical improbability. (Really, only in staged pornography does there seem to be the "rabid" and desparate manipulation of the submissive's clitoris ... as if such is actually supposed to facilitate "relaxation", or even more rediculously the simulated forced entry of unlubricated erections!)

Wherefore my postulate: that only the girl "elects" to deny her very being's "raisson d'etre"; that only the girl makes this "election" without substantially altering her sexual "role" and without employing role reversal; and that only the girl has a psycho-sexual realization of utter selfless self-denial and sex objectification almost entirely without a pleasureable inducement analogous to the boy's prostate. Herein then, if my postulate proves meritorious, lies a profound epiphany: in this one act, where her physical purpose remains the same without role reversal, the girl entirely reverses her purpose from generative being who "employs" males to objectified being who is "employed" by males. (It is a theory.)

Respectfully submitted,
... Marco. :)

---

Marco:

Your theory is a bit complicated, but, in a word: YES.

--SP

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sweet Tiger

...This is one of the few times where I willingly want to be dominated, there is no better way of enjoying anal sex than if you are being dominated and pulled deep onto your partners penis and having your hair and head pulled back.

...anal sex feels great and strangely enough does make you feel very feminine... I don't think I would want to do it on a regular basis; I like to keep it as a special treat for both of us, plus the fact that I like having full control of my colon and bowel movements. :(

---

I agree, there is no better way to dominate a woman. Hair pulling is an essential part of all rear-entry positions (as opposed to cowgirl, etc) when enetering her anus.
But I prefer to control the frequency and occurrence of anal visits. I insist my ladyfriends surrender their choice of when, where and into which hole. I also control the insertion and removal of her plug. If she is with me I don't allow her to do either, she has to ask me if she needs to go poop (I make her use that very phrase - "May I go poop now?")
Accordingly, I go inside my current gf's anus almost every day; sometimes more than once, with occasional relentless marathon poundings. This usually needs a fair bit or restraint for her.
With the careful use of enemas, I gain close to a situation of controlling her bowel movements too, although it occasionally goes embarrassingly wrong for her.

As such, I like to keep those few days without any cock in her anus as a special treat for her. On these days, though, the mouthfucking mentioned earlier comes into play.

please harder Mistress, yes I'm just a slut. It turn my Mistress and me. It gets us both stimulated. I don't have a postrate but the stimulation is still there. Now, training and preperation are required for pleasure the more of each the more the pleasure. so clean up and out and enjoy

Are there anyone here who have good tips on how to convince one's GF to take it anally? We have almost gotten there, but she backed out and won't talk about it anymore.

Fear of the pain is usally what stops her from wanting to proceed. Pay lots of attention to her there. Licking kissing touching massaging. No penetration when doing any of this.

See what develops.

V/R
ID

Another thing could be the fear of making a mess, on you or in bed. It always stress me a bit, so now I have decided to start enema training for some good clean fun :D

Be prepared to take it very slowly - back off if she tenses up, keep trying gently. Patience.

If i know that i plan to do things anal involved, time to break out the enema bag! Its easy enough (but boring!) to do alone. A considerate partner to help pass the time is fun though as well, and the enema itself can become part of the play. If you're into humiliation, its a HUGE plus.

I must admit, I've never used an enema (but have several times been complimented on having a very clean arse, so that's nice). I'm extremely wary of it because having suppositories in hospital before an op., to clear you out, make me feel so ill - shaking, sweating, urge to vomit, and of course urge to empty bowels, but at least that's meant to happen! - does anyone else find any negative side-effects like that from enemas? Thanks