I’m not a real fan of hand holding or people being protected from themselves. If a flaming flamer gets banned than what’s wrong with that? One less on the important membership count? It just might occur to them that there are times that holding your tongue is the preferable thing to do. Than if they really want back they can say sorry or if that fails, create a new username and hopefully a new attitude to go with it. I have read about how kids are so overprotected from themselves these days that they have so little confidence they can barely function in the world. These are valuable life lessons and people just have to learn them. We become adults by learning them, not at some magical point where we cease to childish and naive.
People have the right to fuck up and I wholeheartedly support that right so in the future the world doesn’t end up filled with pussies and idiots. There should be something else done before banning. Think about it, removing someone entirely is an act of last resort rather than any type of corrective action. People need to be punished first. Maybe we can get a Dom with a cane in each state to help with that, I don’t know.
I’m not saying there should be no moderators, I think they are very important to keeping the group as it is. At a specific level of maturity and above. But in a group as close as some of us are there ARE going to be personal issues, there’s absolutely nothing you can do about it other than distance everyone from everyone else or as I’ve seen, remove the ones some don’t like (the latter being an obvious garbage solution, I shouldn’t even have to point that out). Its part of human society, some people will have issues with one another. It needs to be handled maturely, and an ability to do so is what makes an adult and adult. It takes a certain type of person to be a moderator and I don’t think some here have what it takes.