There is a difference between considering something on an intellectual level and OVER intellectualising, just as there is a difference between considering something on an intellectual level and taking something personal on a purely emotional level.
Printable View
There is a difference between considering something on an intellectual level and OVER intellectualising, just as there is a difference between considering something on an intellectual level and taking something personal on a purely emotional level.
Look... I truly dont want to give you a tuff time, but your own words are hard to ignore:
"BDSM is an ersatz experience so yes, it is sugarcoated. Take out SSC and consent and you have the real thing but you are less likely to get the real thing in the life style than outside it"
Now come on - you may express your own life like that, but seriously, can you classify all others in this category? My life certainly is not!
Brosco
Earlier you said that this site was for sharing experiences, you have been a member since early March and made 37 posts, a third of those posts you have made today and have been directed at insulting, trying to insult or baiting me.
I wrote "BDSM is an ersatz experience so yes, it is sugarcoated. Take out SSC and consent and you have the real thing but you are less likely to get the real thing in the life style than outside it"
What is there to explain about that statement, it is self evident what it means and taken alone this statement is out of context because it implies criminal acts. If you read everything I wrote you will see the context in which it was made, plus a little defining with my excahnges with Aesop. As I have pointed out BDSMers are more aware of what they are doing and SSC and consent become self censoring boundaries. It makes little difference to my point, BDSM is sugarcoated, which was the whole point of the OP as far as I could tell and knowing the person who wrote the OP well I knew exactly where she was coming from.
Oh. And if the opening poster was around I would ask her permission to reveal how well I do know her to prove to you I know exactly where she was coming from!
If disagreeing with you is an insult or baiting you, your statistics are probably correct, but to me, having an opposing opinion is not an attack and any (intended) insults from me were in response to yours. Even then, a forum such as this is no place for personal attacks and I have apologised for my part in the exchange. I see you still remain selfrighteous.Quote:
Originally Posted by bunkerchief
Well, I hope you appreciate that while you stated your opinion as fact, it is still just an opinion. As I have stated elsewhere, to me and many others, your opinion is not representative of those you claim to speak for. It is not fact, just your opinion that seems to be coming from a lack of understanding about the lifestyle.Quote:
I wrote "BDSM is an ersatz experience so yes, it is sugarcoated. Take out SSC and consent and you have the real thing but you are less likely to get the real thing in the life style than outside it"
What is there to explain about that statement, it is self evident what it means and taken alone this statement is out of context because it implies criminal acts. If you read everything I wrote you will see the context in which it was made, plus a little defining with my excahnges with Aesop. As I have pointed out BDSMers are more aware of what they are doing and SSC and consent become self censoring boundaries. It makes little difference to my point, BDSM is sugarcoated, which was the whole point of the OP as far as I could tell and knowing the person who wrote the OP well I knew exactly where she was coming from.
I am not sure that this would prove anything at all, but if it makes you happy, please pursue this line. The topic has been posted for general discussion and has been responded to as such. On a forum with thousands of members, the original motivation and experiences of the poster becomes irrelevent, it is purely the topic that is being discussed.Quote:
Oh. And if the opening poster was around I would ask her permission to reveal how well I do know her to prove to you I know exactly where she was coming from!
As I have stated previously, I completely disagree with your opinion and have not found the L/s to be sugarcoated at all. I will not bore those that are capable of reading by restating the reasons for disagreement.
Brosco
Whatever. I've got more interesting walls to hit my head against.
Your far too sensitive for me.
This thread is now closed. If there are any questions pm me.