The Seven Common Types of Internet Submissives

[privatedesire]

Heeh ofcourse i come under the little girl submissive. i knew that as soon as i started reading. Thanks for the great read!

[slickroadway]

Outstanding writing/observations on a par with
good reference material...6 years? obviously time
well spent, thanks for the read.

[MrJerseyGuy]

Nice job TG. Having read the full post, I'd be interested in your perspective on Doms as well. I've been watching a lot of the interaction in chat lately. It would be interesting to see who fits in which category

[slavelucy]

Nice job TG. Having read the full post, I'd be interested in your perspective on Doms as well.

TG has written such an article! You can find it here:

http://www.bdsmlibrary.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1829

HTH

sl

[IndigoFae]

TG has written such an article! You can find it here:

http://www.bdsmlibrary.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1829

HTH

sl

My Sir had me write descriptions of Him and myself based on the ideas of the threads...
I can tell you it was one of the harder writing tasks I've had

[slavelucy]

My Sir had me write descriptions of Him and myself based on the ideas of the threads...
I can tell you it was one of the harder writing tasks I've had

Crikey, i can imagine...writing about oneself is hard enough..writing about your dominant, including 'cons' as well as pro's...without being offensive... It's a fine line, a very fine line.

What an interesting task though *looks all thoughtful*.

Good to hear from You IndigoFae, haven't seen you around in a long while, hope things are good with you.

sl

[IndigoFae]

Crikey, i can imagine...writing about oneself is hard enough..writing about your dominant, including 'cons' as well as pro's...without being offensive... It's a fine line, a very fine line.

What an interesting task though *looks all thoughtful*.

Good to hear from You IndigoFae, haven't seen you around in a long while, hope things are good with you.

sl

uhuh, it was an interesting task in many ways...

thank you, had a lot of things happen, not all of it very nice...
but that's behind me now and i'm trying to get back on the horse, as they say

[Tang]

A bit concerned because as with the 5 Dominant descriptions, all your descriptions are negative. From reading this it would suggest that none of us is going to find any Dom or sub who is not a poser or having such a serious flaw to make interaction with them pointless. I accept these as good warnings, but I think you could list some types that show some of the better sides of BDSM interaction. What happens when your inexperienced subs become more experienced, do they morph into one of your other negative types or is there the possibility of something more positive happening?

As I say, useful, but a bit of a downer for the scene.

[BDSM_Tourguide]

A bit concerned because as with the 5 Dominant descriptions, all your descriptions are negative. From reading this it would suggest that none of us is going to find any Dom or sub who is not a poser or having such a serious flaw to make interaction with them pointless.

Actually, what this and the other thread represent are guidelines for people to use to identify poser types. If a person with whom you are chatting fits into one of these categories, then the likelihood is that he or she has had more online experience than off and may not necessarily know very well how to handle BDSM in a proper context.

And you're right, these descriptions are all negative, because the characteristic types they describe and define are negative types.

[Alex Bragi]

Tang,

Mmm... interesting. I didn't really think of that article as 'negative' until you menitoned it. Like I said, I thought it was a good read; possibly just a little tongue in cheek, but more or less how most online submissives tend to be. Or did I misinterpreted it?

Alex.

[BDSM_Tourguide]

Or did I misinterpreted it?

No, you interpreted it correctly.

[smartass kitten]

This was a very interesting and enlightning read, thank you

I can find myself in several descriptions though..more a combination than one true form...am I the only one?