Quote Originally Posted by BDSM_Tourguide
I haven't changed my mind. I made no mention at all about honesty. I dislike dishonesty in most forms.

What I did say was that I didn't feel a submissive should have to be tamed or broken. Meaning that they should either have the desire to submit or they should not categorize themselves as submissives. What is submissive about someone who resists submitting? What is submissive about disobedience?
So are you saying that I was disobedient in this situation? Or that I resisted submitting to sirken? I was very willing and eager to submit and to please, and did so many times before and after finding out that he may have lied to me in the beginning of our short little affair. It was after the second lie he told me that I went to him first as he had asked me to, only to find that he was still upset that I even questioned him. Yes, I do consider myself submissive. No, I don't have a hell of alot of experience in this lifestyle. But I do feel that a sub has the right to ask questions of her Dom or Master. How else is one supposed to know anything? He even told me himself that I should ask questions if I was unsure of something. Besides, if a sub is never disobedient, how does the punishment come into play? Just because?? And I stand corrected TG, you didn't mention honesty. I did.