The first contract doesn't seem too good and I agree with all that Ruby said about it. I don't understand why anyone would use it really.

One thing that defiantly stood out with me is the money and possessions aspect; the Master/Mistress just decide to leave a slave alone without anything to live on.. it could be used against the sub in so many ways really. But the possessions aspect; a Master/Mistress could do anything with that and the slave would have no say in anything.

The owning the soul thing is a bit strange too; as I'm a believer in that the soul is something important. A person can't be truly alive without their soul to me.. so the idea of a Master/Mistress always owning a submissives soul seems very wrong, for me anyway.

Well that was my two pence anyway