It bears saying that any contract is designed to be suitable for the parties concerned, even if others don't find it very palatable. I would agree though that there are some heavy and perhaps dubious elements to the contract posted here; Ruby raises some good points about the ambiguity over physical safety and permanent injury.

However I have a contract with my Mistress which similarly makes no provision for my financial well-being if we were to part. As it happens I am quite sure that She would 'look after me' in that unfortunate event, but there is no contractual obligation upon Her to do so. She and I sought a situation and a contract that entails real ownership, where Her needs and desires and comfort are far more important than mine.