Quote Originally Posted by Thorne View Post
I noted that, in the latest shooting incident in Colorado, the gunman was taken out by an armed security guard who worked for the church. Even the police had to admit that the man probably saved many lives by reacting as he did and shooting the gunman.

It has to make one wonder how many other such massacres could have been minimized of even prevented if there were more people with weapons, who knew how to use them and were willing to kill to protect others. In that incident at VT, how many would have been saved if there were even one person there who was able to shoot back?

I'm certain that security officer in Colorado feels badly that he had to kill someone. I can't believe any sane person would want to kill another human being. But I hope he will feel better knowing that he may have saved many, many people, including children. Well done!
True byt he was a liscenced gun holder used the gun for security work, I wonder if he uses a semi automatyic rifle or assault weapon to hunt with??

My issue is NOT owing a gun, i just see no logical reason to own to use an Uzi, AK47 or an assault rifle, they are for killing only and shoudd be used in war, not for duck or deer hunting