Actually you are arguing there is no cycle, while at the same time admitting they exist.

As for credible evidence you also have provided none.
The fact of the matter is that there is evidence presented that supports both sides. Yet one side of the argument likes to discount historical events that do not fit the parameters of the hypothesis.

Quote Originally Posted by Wiscoman View Post
Ian, I've got to ask the most obvious question here; so what?

No one's arguing that there isn't some cycle, but no one seems to be able to bring any credible evidence at all that the current warming is a result of that cycle.

As I said before, a cyclical climate is a fact in search of context.