The Human Rights of Child Killers.

[IAN 2411]

You suggested:

Life meaning life with hard labour, and I really do mean hard labour. Work in the open in all weathers regardless of conditions, and twelve hours a day seven days a week. No Sunday let off for religious purposes, because if they really were that way inclined they would not have broken Gods commandment. Wooden huts in compounds to live in and with bare heating essentials, quarries were their menial task helps pay for their incarceration. Wholesome food to keep the body alive but not to satisfy the pallet, a doctor as the only right they have but only to lawfully keep them alive. Give them a minimal show of hell that through their warped minds they have given their victims loved ones.

So now we know what you don't consider to be "brutality." Do you imagine that the discipline in this Gulag would be a sharp telling off? Or would you just appoint plenty of tough macho guards, tell them to keep order and keep up the output, and just not look to see how they were doing it? Because, after all, these people have no rights.

To your question above, yes more than likely, because I certainly would not be going around wiping their tears or wiping their ass, like most liberal reformists. No I don’t consider that to be brutal I consider that to be fair punishment for taking another’s human rights to live, by murdering them. And in answer to this rehabilitation shit, it might be ok for a non violent prisoner but for a cold blooded killer? Not a bats chance in hell.

Why are you all quoting a Gulag, because if you knew the first thing about them there is no comparison?
In a Gulag, there was little or no health coverage for the inmate.

In a Gulag there was very little or no healthy food to eat to keep the inmate alive, because the whole point of being there was they were sent there to die.

So your argument is a non starter.

Be well IAN 2411