I think I now see where the 'freedom of speech' idea came in:

It's called "revenge porn" — the posting of nude or sexually explicit photos or videos online to degrade or harass someone, usually a former spouse or lover.
And states from Arizona to New York are racing to make it a crime.


"This is a delicate issue," says Lee Rowland of the American Civil Liberties Union, who says the legislation is "spreading like wildfire." "The ACLU is concerned both with the protection of privacy and free speech rights."

"But the reality is that revenge porn laws tend to criminalize the sharing of nude images that people lawfully own," says Rowland, a lawyer with the ACLU's Speech, Privacy and Technology Project. "That treads on very thin ice constitutionally."

http://www.npr.org/blogs/itsallpolit...speech-worries

Revenge porn is apparently under debate as to whether to forbid it, or if forbidding it is tampering with freedom of speech. It is not the same thing, unless those photographing under skirts also post their pics on the net. As I see it, intruding on someones privacy can not be included in freedom of speech.