[QUOTE=Curtis]Supposedly, a woman is twice as likely to become pregnant from a single act of rape as she is from a single act of consensual sex. Again supposedly, women have been known to ovulate completely out of cycle during a rape.
[QUOTE]

You are leaving yourself exposed to the exposed to the sociolological based forces of 'reasonablists' ie the sociological trained caring community, who on the whole, I think, would reject this idea. But I heard something similar in a seminar in another life, years ago when I worked for the Probation Service. It was rejected then as something that just couldn't happen, as if a woman had the choice of it happening or not. Of course there are too many variables to be certain. But rape, like all crimes, is culturally based. In some cultures abuction of women is a pre-requisite for procreation. It would be called rape in our culture but not in every culture.

One has to look at the biological evidence and there is evidence showing reasons why women may be inherently more permissive than men and free from socialisation, might not view what our culture sees as rape, rape. If a woman has the sperm of more than one male in her vagina the sperm from each male have killer sperm (theory and not mine) that fight for the prize of impregnation of the female. The upside for the female is she will be inpregnated by the dominant sperm. This suggests the female (free from sociolisation) is quite happy to be taken by more than one male (the right males one assumes). It is the male who wants to protect his female and it is the male that created the crime of rape.

I'm going to stop as the rioja is going to my head.