It is unreasonable for authors to expect to be rewarded with cash; as far as I am concerned, we do this for exposure to the reading public as well as to obtain comment and critical review of our work. Making the reviews meaningful (i.e review by an expert panel) would be most welcome. Feedback by readers is always welcome, of course, but that can be handled very nicely by e-mail, without risking the sort of vindictive review that can do major damage to an authors self-confidence. By all means, keep track of the number of readers, but if each story were reviewed by the same panel, the reviews would be more useful to both authors and readers.
Paul