So i was thinking...

[browny]

I was watching SNL the other nite and they had an animated sketch about obama in which he puts a shock collar on some guy (who's name i can't recall) to keep him away from his campaign. it was only a small part of the sketch, but everytime the guy tried to enter the building, he'd get shocked.

So i started thinking to myself, wouldn't that make a wonderful toy? Put it on a sub, set up proximity sensors around the room and voila! you've got yourself an invisible cage. Its especially fun if you could randomly change the proximity settings, so the helpless little subbie never knows how far he/she can travel before getting zapped.

You could even make a game out of it....just add some toys, a chastity belt, a few cuffs and a key hidden somewhere within the 'protection zone'. Then just sit back and watch the subbie struggle to find the key. oh the possibilities

I wonder if something like that would actually be possible though? i'd imagine there are risks involved with having something like that on your neck, constantly shocking you. Anyone know if this is even plausible?

btw, feel free to share your own twisted games that you'd wanna use something like this for.

[crazy_grrluk]

grrrrrrrrrr u gonna give Master some ideas lol

[***Kate***]

laughs . you can buy these from the local pet store.
Standard Radio Fence Works
The Transmitter plugs into a standard power outlet and emits a radio signal that travels along the boundary wire. You can adjust the signal to up to 15 feet from the wire. In most cases, a 1 metre signal field will be the best for optimal training. The lightweight receiver worn on your pet's collar picks up the radio signal and alerts him as he nears the boundary wire When your dog approaches the boundary, he hears a warning beep andif your dog does not return, he receives a static correction which is startling but not harmful.

[lily27]

They are safe to use, but I imagine entirely unpleasant. If it isn't going to kill a 50-pound dog, it will be fine on a human.

There was a video on America's Funniest Home Videos (shut up, I know you watch it too!) with a guy who had an electronic bark collar on.... he turned it up all the way, and "barked".... most unpleasant, but he was fine.

[butterflySlave4u]

(a thought in my head) maybe hooking the sensors up to a nipple ring chain instead of a collar.......

[browny]

lol ya i was wondering that too....though wouldn't a nipple chain be dangerous? i'd imagine that'd send a current from one nipple to another, and thru your body, with your heart in the middle.

There was a video on America's Funniest Home Videos (shut up, I know you watch it too!) with a guy who had an electronic bark collar on.... he turned it up all the way, and "barked".... most unpleasant, but he was fine.

ya i remember seeing that...i actually looked it up on another forum soon after and someone mentioned that a dogs skin is a lot tougher then a humans, so the shock wouldn't hurt them as much....and mite be more dangerous to humans.

Definately want to give taht a try though...maybe i could set the collars up as cuffs, 2 on the arms 2 on the legs.....hmm

[Tojo]

Actually I'm writing a story that has a shock collar in it, only operated by a remote control.

Electric shocks can certainly be dangerous, & not as predictable as other kinks, I believe women are more susceptible than men too. People supposedly get killed testing 9Volt batteries with their tongues, while others can cut through the main feed line to an office complex & survive....

[tydnchaynz{NSXX}]

wow browny.....i'm sure you've got alot of minds racing with this one! lol

*donning the medical professional uniform for a brief instant* as Tojo points out....electricity in any form is unpredictable at best. And one of the quickest ways to stop a heart as well as to start one. However, i do not believe that shock collars carry anywhere near the volts or amps that Tasers do and the police will not hesitate to use those on humans *shrugs* Something to think about. Or if there were a collar with adjustable voltages that could be experimented with. There's a big difference between "OW damn it!" and "Quick!!! Somebody bring the crash cart!!"

Just personally leery about electricity...and butterfly!!! Attached to a nipple chain?!?!?!?..hmmmmmmmmmmm *daydreamin' for a few*

[butterflySlave4u]

yeah, well, an old womans mind wanders occasionally *wink*

[tydnchaynz{NSXX}]

attach that electricity to that nipple chain and i bet that mind wandering problem could be corrected with a quickness....lmao

[LordGrizzly]

Electric play has gotten more and more popular over the last several years, the violett wand and tens units are very popular, I can't see why barking collars and invisible fences would eb far behind.

[butterflySlave4u]

no kidding, tyd.....yikes!! LOL!

[fetishdj]

I agree that these collars are probably safe on the neck but not been tested anywhere near the nipples and so should probably not be used unless you know what you are doing (and have an EMT on standby )

You can also sometimes buy cheap proximity alarms from electronic shops which are battery powered and can be fixed to any wall and the alarm will sound if the sensor is triggered. With a comnination of these devices (the collar the alarms etc) you could have a 'virtual sub cage' set up to stop your sub wandering too far.

Now, one way to twist this may be to forget the static shock thing but wire the device to a vibrator. Insert vibe, switch on but no power goes to the vibe unless the sub is standing in a particular place (thereby setting off the sensors). If the sub wants pleasure they have to stand somewhere - possibly somewhere uncomforable (in an exposed bit of the garden where anyone can see them - useful if they are naked or provocatively dressed - or kneeling on hard concrete or sharp spikes). You could also try to set it so that the sensor only triggers if the sub stands in a particular part of the room and on tiptoe - meaning that they have to stay on tip toe to get that orgasm (you may need to tie the hands or use a chastity device to stop them pleasuring themselves if you don't trust them not to do this). I would probably start them off with a little stimulation to get them going and begging for more and then activate the sensors so they have to work for the rest of the pleasure

[Nipz]

I agree that these collars are probably safe on the neck but not been tested anywhere near the nipples and so should probably not be used unless you know what you are doing (and have an EMT on standby )

You can also sometimes buy cheap proximity alarms from electronic shops which are battery powered and can be fixed to any wall and the alarm will sound if the sensor is triggered. With a comnination of these devices (the collar the alarms etc) you could have a 'virtual sub cage' set up to stop your sub wandering too far.

Now, one way to twist this may be to forget the static shock thing but wire the device to a vibrator. Insert vibe, switch on but no power goes to the vibe unless the sub is standing in a particular place (thereby setting off the sensors). If the sub wants pleasure they have to stand somewhere - possibly somewhere uncomforable (in an exposed bit of the garden where anyone can see them - useful if they are naked or provocatively dressed - or kneeling on hard concrete or sharp spikes). You could also try to set it so that the sensor only triggers if the sub stands in a particular part of the room and on tiptoe - meaning that they have to stay on tip toe to get that orgasm (you may need to tie the hands or use a chastity device to stop them pleasuring themselves if you don't trust them not to do this). I would probably start them off with a little stimulation to get them going and begging for more and then activate the sensors so they have to work for the rest of the pleasure

That is a great Idea. It would take some engineering to get the voltage down..... Best bet would be to test the vibrator for current and voltage it the original state. Then mod the shock collar to out put the same current and voltage. The process required to mod the sock collar is to advance for me.

Now my question is why not put the shock collar on a thigh? would this be safe?

[icey]

its safer below the chest than above so id say its probably a better option lol

not to put a dampener on things but i remember not that long ago a news article about some guy who had tried out an electric cat collar on himself and had a very bad reaction to it it sent him flying and knocked him flat out.

i never knew they did electric cat collars but there ya go.

[curiousjoe]

Funny you should mention that as I just read something on the net the other day written by a Mistress who used a shock collar regularly on her sub. Having been shocked a few times while repairing things around the house I’m not sure how much I’d enjoy that. But I agree it might be an interesting experience to try.

CJ

[butterflySlave4u]

not to put a dampener on things but i remember not that long ago a news article about some guy who had tried out an electric cat collar on himself and had a very bad reaction to it it sent him flying and knocked him flat out.

i never knew they did electric cat collars but there ya
go.

can you imagine what it would do to the cat! But i'm reminded of an old saying...."women and cats can do anything they want, and men and dogs should get used to the idea"