I am an Aries despite not being sporty, physical, action orientated or any of the things Aries are supposed to be (mainly arrogant thuggish bullies...). Though according to one book I read, I am a perfect 'intellectual Aries' which means I am a stubborn, tenacious, debator and arguer and therefore an 'intellectual bully'

Its an allegedly 'dominant sign' as well (one of the fire signs) but as I am a sub I think it is coming out mainly in my tendency to be an adrenalin junkie with respect to pain and danger....

Like Oz I am not a big beleiver in astrology from the point of view of 'you were born then therefore you are...'. However, I see it as a means of personality typing that is just as valid as any modern psychological test. You can group anyone into one of the 12 zodiac signs based on personality profile. Ok, I don't see personality testing as being particularly valid either... so you probably get my point on my attitude to psychological testing and generalisations