IMHO just because the Library is called 'BDSM' does not make it an exclusive repository of BDSM feelgood tales, recipes and recollections (not to mention braggings). If I was to ban anything from the site it would be the lifestyle sections which do not belong in a library! Fiction it is, fiction it should be, and censorship of any kind squelches fiction.

Now I agree people should be warned about what they read. My own collection does not use the usual abbreviations to indicate content, but a limited list of common turn-offs - I call it the SQUICK system for Snuff, Queer, Underage, Incest, Critters and Kaviare. Sometimes i'm in the mood to push the envelope re a given turn-off, sometimes not. I see it as a pity that the 'real world' effectively killed the 'underage' posting on this site, certainly any such posting purporting to reflect real facts or encourage real deeds should be investigated to the utmost, but pure fiction is harmless.

Still IMHO, bad grammar and punctuation are worse turnoffs than snuff! I do not find snuff enjoyable per se but its occurrence in a tale helps setting a very peculiar atmosphere. More abandon, if you like... nothing to lose... including for the victim... There's a pic by Zerosen which illustrates this well by showing a sentenced witch who - seemingly of her own will - blows her executioner as another one burns off her nipples... ah well, enough said, this an academic discussion after all!