Quote Originally Posted by steelish View Post
So FDR's first year in office he
*became President of two major American auto manufacturers?
I wasn't going to address this, but since you brought it up again to affirm your point, I feel it prudent to clarify this.

Obama is not the president of GM and Chrysler. The CEO of GM is Whitacre while the CEO of Chrysler is Marchionne.

The federal governments of Canada and US, and the Provincial government of Ontario have loaned the two companies money in order to restructure themselves, and remain viable. It is unfair that a large company gets the advantage of public funds, while a small business does not. But the issue at hand here is that millions of families would be affected if just these two companies fail. Downside to pure, unadulterated capitalism is that if an industry leader fails, the public suffers. Between the choice of hundreds of thousands of people becoming unemployed overnight, worsening the whole housing mess even further, and loaning money to these companies with public funds (which they have to return), I choose jobs. You may disagree, which is fine. What you can not state though, is that Obama is the president of these two companies. Without government loans, there would be no GM, no Chrysler today. Tax payers are shareholders of the company. Obama cannot become president of a company by using tax payers money.



Quote Originally Posted by steelish View Post
*he lead America to a single payer healthcare system?
Again, no he didn't. I wish people really informed themselves with what was included in the bill. There is no death panels, no conspiracy to become the Soviets, and no single payer healthcare system.

Single payer is what we have in Canada. Public Option which was what the Dems were trying to push until Liberman demanded it's removal, was a system to offered an alternative to private healthcare for those who otherwise wouldn't have access to it.


Quote Originally Posted by steelish View Post
*he seized control in massive land grabs?
The federal government buying more land is socialist? The 14 sites were selected designated to protect National landscapes. There are tons of federal and state parks that aren't considered land grabs when they were first proposed, so why is this? I visisted the Adirondacks, and fell in love with the place. Gas stations made money by me fueling up, the local bar made money when I ate there. There were boat tours, and a vast number of services offered to tourists. Economic activity was not depressed.

And this land belongs to the government, your government. Not Obama, so when a Republican gets into office, it still belongs to the government. Democratic government or Republican government.


Bah...not going to address all the points. I don't want to write a book.