I stand corrected, I wasn't aware that either of those religions had that element as well as rebirth.
Because, as I said, it wasn't a place of punishment: whether you went there wasn't about virtue but heroism. (It's been said that the main reason Christianity caught on in Northern Europe was that it offered everyone a shot at heaven, not just the heroes.)
Before Christianity gave its own meanings to the concepts of heaven and hell, the pagan peoples of Europe imagined the dark side of the afterlife. The Norse pictured Hel, the corpselike goddess of death, as queen of a grim underground realm populated by those who had died of sickness and old age. This view of hell involves a dread of death and a horror of the cold, dark, decaying grave, but it does not suggest a place of punishment.I'm familiar with this, which is why I didn't instance the Classical civilisations.
The Greek underworld was divided into three regions: Hades, Tartarus, and Elysium. Most of the dead went to the kingdom of the god Hades. In the deepest part of the underworld, a terrible dark place known as Tartarus, the very wicked suffered eternal punishment at the hands of the Furies. The third region, Elysium or the Elysian Fields, was where exceptionally good and righteous people went after death.Which is, in more detail, what I said.
The image of hell as a place of torment for sinners emerged fully in the Persian mythology based on the faith founded in the 500s B . C . by Zoroaster. According to Zoroastrian belief, souls are judged after death at a bridge where their lives are weighed. If the outcome is good, the bridge widens and carries them to heaven. If they are judged to have been evil, the bridge narrows and pitches them down into a dreadful hell. Those whose lives were an equal mix of good and evil go to a realm called hamestagan, in which they experience both heat and cold.
The early Hebrews called their afterworld Sheol and pictured it as a quiet, sad place where all the dead went. By around 200 B . C ., under the influence of Zoroastrianism and other belief systems, the Jews had adopted the idea of judgment for the dead. The afterworld became a heaven for the good and a hell for the wicked.
As I said, not an afterlife of judgement and punishment.
According to the Maya, the souls of most of the dead went to an underworld known as Xibalba. Only individuals who died in violent circumstances went directly to one of the heavens. In the Mayan legend of the Hero Twins, told in the Popol Vuh, Xibalba is divided into houses filled with terrifying objects such as knives, jaguars, and bats. The twins undergo a series of trials in these houses and eventually defeat the lords of Xibalba. The Aztecs believed that the souls of ordinary people went to an underworld called Mictlan. Each soul wandered through the layers of Mictlan until it reached the deepest level."
So, I accept I was mistaken about India and China. That still leaves a lot of "corners of the globe" that didn't believe in punishment for sins after death, and still doesn't offer any evidence for your assertion that this belief was so universal that it predates agriculture. As I said, the fact that Stone Age cultures apparently believed in life after death in some form doesn't tell us what form they imagined, and certainly doesn't give us any reason to believe they had already evolved the beliefs that your quoted authority dates to the late Iron Age.