While I will always stand by and say rape is a craim against humanity. And Rape is wrong and all the PC mombo jumbo etc. But the lady in the kobie briant case I am not sure she was raped.
I know the whole "nuts or sluts defence" is fully in use in that trieal. And frankly He was an incredible moron to even considerd sleaping with a stranger.
But I think it might have been consenual. I mean She brings a pair of panties that she was supose to have been raped in.
but it has some one elses DNA. And now she is filing a civel suit against him seaking damages. I think some one burnd the tea.

I think it takes 2 to tango, He is an ediot and she is after some fast money.

Look at it this way:

She is over heard bragging to her friends about the "great sex she just had"

She brings Panties that she was supose to have been raped in to court and it proves that she had sex a short time after she was raped.

Now she proves that she wants the money. by filing a civel suit seaking damages.

Rape is wrong. When any one says no all bets are off.

But you have to addmit if she was realy raped then wouldnt she have been so tamitiese by the event sex would probly be the last thing she would want.

I am not a big fan of millionair basketball player or there highpower lawyrers.

But I think something is fishy here.