Quote Originally Posted by DuncanONeil View Post
Seems it a two edged sword. There are some studies but they seem to focus on income as the greatest indicator of giving. Results, in graph terms, create a "U" shape. But even that is "adjusted".
With the rich giving a lot, and the "poor" giving a large percentage. But the folks in the middle create the bottom of the "U".
These are old but seem to give the clearest picture. Personally I favor the second, because of the author, but it is consistent with the first.

I'm a little confused with your response.

I had initially responded to your assertion of:
Quote Originally Posted by DuncanONeil View Post
And yet the greatest contribution to charity comes from those that have accumulated the most!
With the fact that many, non-rich people are helping out as well, in their own manner.

So what do you mean by the double edge sword in this regard?