women as pets

[nastywolf]

All your postings make me writing again - don't expect a 'well-structured' post - just a few ideas ....

'Pets' and 'Slaves'
both have an owner (Mistress/Master)
- collared/tattoed --- owned
Mistress/Master love them and feel responsible (hopefully) and take care for them
- they are told - when/how/where to sleep-go-eat-having SEX - etc.

BUT
you can tread a slave LIKE a pet -- a pet never is a slave
its the humilation-thing which makes the difference - so - (as always ?) - its your mind making petism/petplay that nice.
(Thx Silke - u gave me the idea to write this)

I guess almost all people have/had fantasies about being an animal in their minds - playing 'dog' in our childhood, its just one example - many people (not only females) love that fantasy or they think how it might be 'breeded' by a dog (animal) -

(laughing) - pttwyn - well, there ARE reasons to be jealous about a dobermann LMAO - but, some like to share ......

and - last but not least - could you see that surprise on my face ? - i am wondering that on a place like this - i saw a lot of 'hard and weired stuff' here - the idea of K9 is as unbelievable as BDSM is for 'Vanilla-People'

[pttwyn]

Yes NW, there is a great difference in having a slave and a pet. I think the attraction for many subs is that the pet can be irresponsible. Where slave-girls can be expected to perform certain functions.

True beastality really is a different sort of thing.