poll for deleting snuff stories

[fetish101]

Child pornography: pictures or video depicting underage minors sexually. ie: actual kids, actual exploitation.

Writing stories about absolutely anything: Fictional content for the sole purpose of fantasy. ie: no real people, no exploitation of any kind.

It is my belief that no story should be censored on this site, even if it contained children 2 years old! I wouldn't be turned on by a story like that, and probably wouldn't read it (perhaps out of curiosity), but then again, like everyone has said, that is precisely why the story codes are there.

You cannot compare these two things, they just aren't the same thing at all!

Just because someone like Jeanne has opinions and is brave enough to stand up and be heard does not make her any less of a submissive. Submissive does not mean silent. Furthermore, she is not your submissive, so why should she be submissive to you or anyone other than her dominant?

[BDSM_Tourguide]

Just because someone like Jeanne has opinions and is brave enough to stand up and be heard does not make her any less of a submissive. Submissive does not mean silent. Furthermore, she is not your submissive, so why should she be submissive to you or anyone other than her dominant?

Settle down. I doubt he meant anything by it.

[fetish101]

Settle down. I doubt he meant anything by it.

Yes..I really must watch how I post things. I didn't mean anything by it either, it just seems to come out that way. I think I'll spend more time reading how my posts come off, instead of how effectively I want to make my point.

[Spitman]

I don't know how we got onto this topic from 'poll for deleting snuff stories'.

By definition 'stories' are fiction, so the issue of illegal pictorial pornography does not arise, and although I have no doubt that there are snuff stories with young characters, that was not the issue raised in this thread. I think the original reason for starting this thread was a personal dislike of the idea of snuff as an acceptable category for erotic literature in the bdsm library.

It is rather like having a single vote to ban headscarves in schools, fox hunting, coloured ice cream and adult magazines, or not.

There are several threads already in existence that discuss various aspects of underage characters and their legality, and I'm sure there will be more. BDSM Library has a perfectly acceptable policy on that topic as has been explained here, but that has nothing to do with snuff stories.

[j]

I think Fetish has prefectly answered Lajan's first remarks to me. In my own personal collection, maintained for my own pleasure, I don't have any fiction with 2-year olds, but I would have no objection on seeing it on the Library. Seeing a video or photo would drive me to grab the phone.

I AM a sub, albeit with vividly expressed opinions.

And my fetish about hairy twats is (as far as I can fathom) a way of ensuring that, in any scene I vicariously enjoy, the 'victims' are not Ms Next Door Housewife, but a saucy slut who at least has the capacity to appreciate the erotic side of her predicament (even if she does not! and even if the depilation is quite recent - it does wonders for the girl's attitude). Also I think hair hinders the audience's sight and blunts the executioners' tools.

I always view with much favor stories where authors take care to offer bare-naked twats to the gentle attentions of sadists. This generally means the overall fun will be exquisite and imaginative.

Why should I not have my own prejudices, quirks and fetishes?

[BOBBY SHEPHERD]

I am new to posting on this forum although I have been a member for some time ,this is the first issue I feel like I should respond to.
I am an author and post on this site,I also write some Snuff stories.This does not mean that I do any of it in real life,or want anyone to do anything I write about.Everthing I write is FICTION.If my stories upset anyone I ask that they not read them.
When we start to censor things it reminds me of Nazi Germany and Adolf Hitler,first you burn the books and then you burn people.

[Curtis]

All right, people, let's try this again:

The person who started this thread -- TWO YEARS AGO -- has long since disappeared from the Forum and has no interest in our opinions. Jinn is not going to stop posting snuff stories to the Library, so why are so many people acting as though this is an actual issue?

There's no real debate, because everyone is on the same side of the issue (even LaJan, if I understand his post; he's seems to be debating a semantic point within Jeanne's post, not disagreeing with her general concept. I'm sure he'll be by to correct me if I got that wrong), and even if there was a debate, the decision has long since been made, so the debate that doesn't exist would be moot if it did exist.

I swear to God that the only reason you people show up to post every day is to see how high you can raise my blood pressure. I know! How about another rousing round of "Why Are BDSM Girls All Fat and Ugly"? Jesus! Here's a quarter -- go buy a clue!

[slavelucy]

Yes..I really must watch how I post things. I didn't mean anything by it either, it just seems to come out that way. I think I'll spend more time reading how my posts come off, instead of how effectively I want to make my point.

Actually Fetish, i agreed with what you said; i'm sure La Jan didn't mean anything by it, but if the definition of being a submissive is, in terms of this site and otherwise, to be silent and meek, then, er, i shall be forced to throw in the submissive towel!!

i kinda also agree with Curtis as well, everyone is all arguing roughly the same point and i'm starting to wonder if it's been done to death. *taps Curtis's blood pressure monitor* breathe dear, breathe!

sl