H LD, look ... I am angry, not so much for the low rating given to a story I've worked very hard on, but that there was no informative feedback as to why the reviewer felt my story wasn't good. This has been my gripe for a while now. Readers (and authors) can simply make a rating, add in a couple of words and that is suppose to be a review.

A story has a lot of components and it isn't easy getting them to work together. If a part of a story doesn't make sense, needs a spell checker, has bad grammer, doesn't flow, etc ... then fine, but reviewers need to write that in the review. Not just "I don't like it."

Insubstantial reviews like that are a waste of time, energy and don't help anyone, especially the author.

FB