I've noticed a few things about the review process. It might just be me but it seems the first review tends to set the tone. It’s as if reviewers read the other reviews before striking out on their own. I should also mention that the most popular story I’ve written is also the lowest rated. A historic spoof (Lien the Fifth (
http://www.bdsmlibrary.com/stories/s...?storyid=3873)) which started out nasty and got worse was critiqued as not being erotic enough, based on the first chapter. Perhaps it was a fair sentiment though It was was meant to be vicious and sadistic and not really envisioned as a terribly erotic story. The first reviewer hit it with a 2 and the next two were 5 and 7 then I got some more reasonable critiques.
Still the story has nearly thirty five thousand hits and only ten reviews so you have to figure the bulk of the people reading it aren’t interested in the reviews
Just some rambling thoughts
Mad Lews