Evolution: Science or Philosophy

[TomOfSweden]

ToS -- That may be.

just not choosing a side. Odd that an opinion that doesn't support either idea would be seen as smart assed. I just consider it open to something other than what has already been put out by other factions .

I think there are gaps in both theories.

For example - we have an unexplained chromosome. how come there is no explaination for this one by scientists? Others have an explanation ....

Sometimes not picking sides is just taking the lazy road. I'm not calling you an idiot or anything. But there's really is no middle ground between ID and evolution, since ID isn't a theory. Only an anti-theory. It's dressed up to pose as a theory. But since it makes no claims, there's nothing to test or refute. Which is crucial for the definition of a theory.

Saying that "the complexity of nature is much too intricate to come to by chance" is saying nothing. Unless you can specify why it's unlikely it came to be by chance it's just voicing a vague opinion that carries no weight. ID proponents can't agree on much at all. Nobody has bothered to define gods physical properties. As if it's unimportant. Anything that can physically effect this world must have some kind of a physical manifestation. I've not read or heard about a single attempt to explain it, even though it's critical here.

edit: I've never heard anything about any unexplained chromosome. Please explain.