This seems like an easy enough rule, but I believe most people interested in BDSM knows that there is a very fine line between consensual and nonconsensual.
You can always use safe words, but for some, this takes the edge of the whole BDSM-play.
If your sub has told you on numerous occasions that she wants you to rape her, and you do, while she objects, is this consensual or not? If you don't have a safe word, or if she is gagged, how can you ever be sure you do not cross the line?
Then again, is it not often the wish of a sub to be forced to do that which she would never do voluntarily?
Having a BDSM relationship is about making some or parts of your fantasies come true. If a sub's fantasies involves being raped, really being raped, what good would it do her if her dom could never imagine really raping her? Sure, you can say that with a fantasy like that sub has, her chosen dom can never rape her in the legal meaning, because she is actually always consenting, but I think that is making the answer too easy.
I say that if a sub has a dream about really being raped, and her dom rapes her despite her saying their safe word, this is not abuse. This is making her dream come true. A jury would probably come to the opposite position, if the case went to court, but the jury is not always right.






Reply With Quote