Global Warming/Climate Change

[TomOfSweden]

Looky looky what I found. It's a BBC documentary called "The great global warming swindle". It leans on theories that carbon emissions should go up when temperature rises. Which is a causality issue. If true then carbon emissions is not evidence for us causing global warming.

This documentary is guilty of the same crimes enviromentalists are, namely that they make too big of a deal of numbers we aren't sure of yet. The bottom line is that nobody knows. Not even almost. If nothing else, this documentary proves that the oposite side has just as good arguments for ignoring carbon emission cut backs

part 1
part 2
part 3
part 4
part 5
part 6
part 7
part 8
part 9
part 10

[ms_minx]

Looky looky what I found. It's a BBC documentary called "The great global warming swindle". It leans on theories that carbon emissions should go up when temperature rises. Which is a causality issue. If true then carbon emissions is not evidence for us causing global warming.

This documentary is guilty of the same crimes enviromentalists are, namely that they make too big of a deal of numbers we aren't sure of yet. The bottom line is that nobody knows. Not even almost. If nothing else, this documentary proves that the oposite side has just as good arguments for ignoring carbon emission cut backs

part 1
part 2
part 3
part 4
part 5
part 6
part 7
part 8
part 9
part 10

If the BBC wasn't controlled by the government, I'd be more likely to believe half the things they transmitted. If this was a Channel 4 documentry, I'd be more convinced. With causality, you have to accurately determine temporal precedence and that is the strongest evidence avaliable yet.
xxx

[TomOfSweden]

If the BBC wasn't controlled by the government, I'd be more likely to believe half the things they transmitted. If this was a Channel 4 documentry, I'd be more convinced. With causality, you have to accurately determine temporal precedence and that is the strongest evidence avaliable yet.
xxx

I'm not sure I follow you, but it does seem like heat increased and then co2. co2 emissions did go up 1000-1300 without human intervention.

and BBC being controlled by the govornement is a really lame conspiracy theory issue. All it means is that it's more likely to be pc, not less. The private channels work with selling news. Which, in this case doesn't exactly strengthen their position.

[ms_minx]

and BBC being controlled by the govornement is a really lame conspiracy theory issue. All it means is that it's more likely to be pc, not less. The private channels work with selling news. Which, in this case doesn't exactly strengthen their position.

I agree, I agree Tom, as I'm not one for conspiracy theories. But do take the time to read about the BBC Complaints Audit, if you can be bothered. It doesn't make for riveting reading. But when your Boss tells you what to air and what not to air, you listen. Could explain (and please note I said 'could' not 'does') explain why there has been more changes in this company than shuffles in our (i.e. UK) Labour's goverment benches! Tony was 'green' in 1997 and currently, Gordon Brown is a murky shade of his surname on the matter. When he is the next PM, then that's what the basis of future BBC documentaries will be based around. Again, to my personal opinion, so far there has only been an association but very recently, temporal precdence has been demonstrated with regards to global warming, thus implying causality.
xxx