I fully agree - is why I suggested it should be a act of abuse not of rape. As you say, a question of semantics, but which can sometimes be helpful and sometimes misleading. (Just to further muddy the waters, were 'virtual rape' to be considered to rape, then there should certainly not be any doubt that male is real - which is a hotly argued topic.)
'Traditional' rape does not have to be sudden or unexpected, and is quite often not. But then since I have already said that I believe it would be an act of abuse rather than of rape, that is irrelevant.
Which only leaves the question of whether 'virtual rape' is bullying. It is not something I have experienced, nor have I spoken to anyone who has, but I would err on the side of it being bullying.
Whilst on the matter of symantics, I have to pick up your use of the word 'should' in 'that person should be counselled'. That makes it sound like a punishment for the victim. Yes, they should be offered it, but effective counselling is challenging and often painful for the counsellee, and should only be undertaken voluntarily and when the person is ready. Will go with 'they should be offered counselling', which I suspect is what you meant anyway.
And as for punishement - well that is whole new can of worms.
Suspecting we are having a heated agreement,
cariad