actually the analogy is a fundemental of adolecent psychology.Originally Posted by slavelucy
yes training is a big part of the relationship. But there are smaller portions of a D\s relationship that don't need to be experianced with the "one"Originally Posted by slavelucy
I think the big differance here is you are monogomous and I am polyamorus. I do agree with you that just because a sub is a sub she should be listening to ever guy that comes along. I do thing in a D\s social setting respect should be kept, as you are a representation of your owner. If you are rude etc thenOriginally Posted by slavelucy
that reflects negativly on your owner. Now if your owner dislikes the person I say be as much of a bitch as you want.
this is splitting hairs to me. I'm not having a D\s relationship in the Master slave they are owned by me sense your correct.Originally Posted by slavelucy
additionally I have no problem with one of my girls scene with another Dom but though he may be the physicality behind the actions, her submission is still to me and my desires. I directed her to do so hence that is why. This entire concept of doing as any Dom says is an IRCism or online thing. Even if you look back to Old guard. You pay respect but you do not follow the commands of another Master unless your own Master has instructed you to do so.Originally Posted by slavelucy
I really don't think were that far off base of each other, as I do view the trainer/charge relationship different then I view the Master/slave relationship. But I Do think many new people learn some good things from trainers that prepare them for better relationships.