Quote Originally Posted by BDSM_Tourguide
With a range of content from sexy to scary, Moon's asrtistic photography is some of the most unusual I have seen. To see more of his work or to contact him, visit his site at: Moon1299

Comments are always appreciated.
I find the work a little over reliant on technique over content for my tastes. The photographer is too involved with taking a good photograph that he doesn't appear to be involved with his subject never mind being inspired by it. I find the work rather static and mannered. The photographer also seems to want to give his work the gravitas of renaisance paintings. Why?

Modern cameras are lightweight and easy use, allowing the photographer to be part of the action. This photographer doesn't seem to care about his subject. He is so detached. The last thing I want to think about when I look at an image is the technique gone into creating it. With this work it's the first thing I think about. If the photographer is involved and inspired by his subject, that energy should be coming through to me. It doesn't. This is a gripe I have with much that is passed off as erotic photograhy, it just isn't erotic even though the subject might be. Though even here the subject is something of a cliche, I've seen these images done so often by other photographers.

Look at the photographers Eric Krol and Araki. Their images make you think they really get off on their subject matter. That radiates to their audience.

Hmm. Maybe I've had a bad day.