I agree with Alex that I can understand what the author is trying to say, but the point of the message is far too complex than what the meaning is trying to convey.

Maybe I am too simplistic in my thinking, but this is how I percieve this entire message to be, without trying to analyze the crap out of it.

The author has taken three different sets of people, police, firefighters, etc..., ~ people who live thier lives as best they can, who are not police firefighters, etc..., ~ and the people who are hardwired to commit nasty crimes. He has changed those people into three different terms. The Warrior, the Sheep, and the Wolf.

I have no idea if this peice of writing has ever been published or if it is just the writers own personal thoughts. Either way the message, while a bit much and hard to pull out, is there.


I don't want to say I am correct in my interpretation of it, but this is what I presume to be the complete message of this post in regards to Dominants and submissives.

There are Warriors who are Dominants; and yes there are subs as well, they understand the needs of submissives and other Dom/mes and at times they feel that it is thier responsibility to help and guide others along, or it is just a natural thing to them. To be a strong force in anothers life to help, guide and protect them along in thier journey.

There are submissives who are sheep. They are strong and live thier lives to the fullest of their capacity, but what they truly desire is a Dom/me who understands thier needs. There are also Dom/mes who are sheep, looking for a sub to understand and complete them as well.

There are Dom/mes as well as subs (players), who are wolves who take advantage of others at every opportunity they can get.
They are deviant and care nothing of anothers feelings. They live to take advantage of others;whether it be intentional or not.

You can label everything as much as you want A, B, C, ~ Warrior, Sheep, Wolf, ~ Dom/me, Sub, Player, the message will still be conveyed in some form. It is still the same basic message.

My whole two cents on this