A coupl of points to ponder

1.The police themselves addmitted that they did not have eneogh evidence to convict (sadly her lawyers whilst probably good chose the wrong defence strategy)
2.The bag containing the drugs was not in her possession at the time(she was asked if the bag was hers and to open it after it had passed through how many hands?[akin to shooting someone then giving the gun to someone else. No matter how you look at that scenario the person that did the deed is the guilty one the other is just an innocent patsy])
3. The judges at the trial (and only those judges) have never given an innocent verdict. These same judges stated publicly that they did not care what happened outside Indonesia so it did not really matter what the defense tried to prove in that regard
4. In America you are innocent till proved guilty in Indonesia you are guilty till proven innocent an entirely different legal system to what you are used to
5. Media will only provide information that will sell as that is their business they do not care if the only facts reported are skewed to that ideal as a non story will not bring in revenue. If you do not believe this then ask your media lecturers and then check on various media outlets in your area on a subject that you know to be true you will be shocked at just how two or three media barons can control the world.(James Bond's The World Is Not Eneogh is not just some script writers fantasy)
6.If someone places a $250,000 diamond necklace into your bag without your knowledge are you guilty or innocent( personally i would hope that you would be found innocent as it is the prosecutions duty to prove you
a)stole it
b)had knowledge of the theft
Contrary to popular belief it is not the defence's duty to prove you innocent it is the prosecutor's job to prove you guilty the notion of the defence having to prove you innocent is a myth propergated by the media and allowed to flourish by lazy prosecutors.(sadly though due to dramatisation by the visual media ,mainly, it is not something that i believe will ever be redressed as it will kill off half of any court drama)
7. If someone is studying internation laws then they should do so without predjudice, that is just because it happens that way here it should happen that way there, if you ask most peoples of the world their main grievance against other countries they will tell you that they are fed up with people telling them how the laws should be in their countries.A case point if you want one is the US's stand on human rights treaties in foriegn countries when the US has so far failed to abide by most of the treaties it has with Native Americans

I could probably go on for hours but if you don't get the point of the disscussion by now you never will so i will leave you all to ponder what i have posted just remember though that these are MY views and it is up to you to decide what your views are