Quote Originally Posted by Warbaby1943 View Post
Why am I starting this thread? Glad you asked.

I have PMed both Rabbit and cariad with what I thought were legitimate questions and they both chose to ignore me. Cariad ignored me twice and the only reason Rabbit didn't match that is because I could no longer PM him since it seems he has taken away that privilege for us. I did end up getting an answer to 1/3 of my questions in the Site announcements which I hadn't seen before I sent off the PMs. So my reason for this thread is to get an answer hopefully from an administrator.

Now my question and/or suggestion was prompted by a thread from someone I consider a great asset to this site, moptop. She in nowway is involved in my inquiry only inspired it by her Farewell post.

She suggests, and it is true, that there are those here who never seenm to make any posts of any substance. They are only concerned with post count. Their post count is made in the fun and games section. It is no secret that I too have made very many posts in the Fun and Games section and I like that section. Still I would like to ask if that forum could be eliminated from the New Posts search. That way for those of us here who are interested in contributing to threads of substance don't have to wade through post after post involving the Fun and Games. If others agree it would be nice to see your comments here as well.

Since the administrators seem to find it easy lately to ignore my PMs I am hoping they will answer this question here out in the open for everyone to see.


I must say I just learned about Rabbit and my deepest sympathies go out to his family. I now understand why he didn't answer me and I sincerely apologize for anything I had been thinking about him especially since in the past he always was very prompt in answering my PMs. My apologies to all involved but in my defense it was early last week when I sent my first PMs.
I will tell you that cariad is not choosing to ignore you either. She has extremely good reason for not being available.
Ed.