Quote Originally Posted by Ruby
Dear GaelstormIRA,

Thanks so much for posting this.

It's a popular contract making its way around the web and quite frankly, it scares the hell out of me.
We could take it apart one piece at a time and anyone wanting to use this non Safe, Sane and Consensual contract should do so. We could even argue that it goes beyond Risk Aware Consensual Kink, because aside from the "consensual" signing of this contract, the word "consensual" and the slave's right to consent is taken away in almost every paragraph.

I've seen at least one wife wanting to use it with her husband, not understanding that the relationship would then become poly and he could give her away at any time. He told her if they used it, he would divorce her so she could be his full time slave and not his wife any longer.

My opinion:

Follow this contract long enough and it doesn't matter that its not legal by the laws of most lands, it will be brainwashed into the slave's mind that to uphold her/his end of the bargain, the promise they made, etc., they need to follow the contract.

It does not address possible children, health insurance, long term health care, retirement of the slave, or mental health issues.

Let's say the slave is ordered to drink the urine of another person, that person has an active case of herpes... would the slave have veto power?

Let's say the slave has been ordered to kiss someone who has just eaten something like peanuts, to which the slave is deathly allergic...would the slave have veto power?

In these or any other cases, after time, would the slave actually have the ability to use the veto power?

This contract gives the Master the right to prostitute his slave as well as permanently give him/her away. Does said slave have the right to terminate the contract when given away? Not if I'm reading this correctly.

The master accidently kills the slave and the contract is terminated. No kidding! What recourse does the slave's family have? Has a bank account been set up? Insurance paid in advance? If so, wouldn't this be like actually buying the person?

The master permanently damages/marks the slave.
What is the penalty? Aside from the contract being broken, does the slave have monetary recourse?

Let's talk about money? Who is paying taxes? Managing bank accounts?
It would be very easy for a Master to have a slave sign over all of his/her worldly goods, then in a few months, say, "It isn't working. You are free to go. I terminate this contract." Slave leaves with what? A driver's license and birth certificate? Cause the slave now owns nothing.

I could go on and on. In theory, a contract sounds like sexy, fun way to cement the relationship.

In reality, contracts like this can be exploitive and dangerous. If anyone wants to sign up for this or any other contract, please seek legal council, first. Why?
Hmmmm..... because it's not SS&C or RACK and according to the contract, you would sign up knowing that you may be raped - used sexually against your will - but you are giving permission before the event.

Know your rights! I can't stress enough that there is only one unique "you" and each of you deserve the very best in your lives.

I'd like to hear from our forum members what you think about this contract?
Other's like it?
Who's used a slave contract?
How did it work out for you?
Would you recommend using a contract to others?

If you can stop at least one person from making the same mistakes you've done, or show someone how something gave you bliss, then you've made the world a better place. It's not easy to step forward, but enough of you have PMed me privately about these type of contracts that I hope you will tell the part of your story that you can.

Best regards,

Ruby
When I reread this contract I became more and more scared at the prospects that this particular contract holds. If my Master would want this kind of contract it would need to be picked apart and altered a lot to suit our needs. This contract does not take into consideration that I am a person and do want my feelings considered. I wouldn't recommend this contract, as is, to be sure. I still don't understand how the Master can keep the soul and not the body.

All the points that Ruby points out is something to consider. Since my Master is my husband I wouldn't consider this contract, as is, because I don't want to be his personal prostitue for another Master to use as he pleased and I sure don't want to go and find him another slave for him to use. Then there is the veto prospects. All of these things I have moral issues with. I would hope that my Master, or any other Master/Mistress, would want to consider the slaves moral issues when he/she takes her/him has his/her slave.

There are many like my husband and I who want to consider slave contracts but I do beleive that designing one to our needs is going to be way we are going to go.

Now that brings me to other questions. Is it common place in M/s relationships to have written contracts? Or is it mostly glamorized by the BDSM M/s comunity? Is it acceptable to be 'slave' to my Master and be collared without a contract?

submissive wife