For American Pysco, that's a book though. Not text on a screen open to every person on the internet. A book has to be mainly obtained through a library, or ordered from some distributor. So, access is not so easily available. unlike here, where access is open to every single user of the internet, and with the click of a button they can jump from one topic to the next as quickly as they so desire. Simply put, a book is solid and defined and you get exactly what it depicts, and then it ends. It's only what is in the book. The internet is a Mass of content, and you get basically anything you want, and things you don't want. You're basically swimming in a sea of anything, unlike a book where it follows a defined start to finish guideline and you pick when you want to be subjected to it, and for how long. You could argue you can with reading stories here aswell on the same basis, but because of the simply quick change, and fluid connection you can have from any other subject matter to a bdsm subject matter, is of a 'concern' to people. Again, children and their access. Little people who are afraid of the truths of life, and refuse to accept that they exsist, so they accept the 'reality' that it doesn't and if it does it's a perversion of life and must be stopped. The internet gives them the greatest advantage to impose their power, and it's also very difficult. Unfortunatly, topics with Children and sex easily fall against their moral boundaries, and they are taking advantage of that. You know they will never debate the topic of expression on that matter, no one could win the argument. Could you imagine "so and so defends novels depicting Rape of Children". Defend, Rape and Children being in huge block letters. No one wants to be smeared with such a unbalanced, mutated aspect for defending expression, but that's what it would come down to. I've been in the hiding for the past 20 years so I don't know much about what's out there, but do you know many novels that depict the rape of a child in graphc detail, or sex with minors that has reached the aspect of popularity that American Pyscho has? I mean, american pyscho, even the title has something in it. I have not read it or seen the movie but I figure, it has to be 'solid' enough to be considered a 'novel' with such topics in it. Having large aspects of topics not directly retaining to sex and murder, but to with a fluid blend of other aspects. Leading to the understanding(in however that comes) and fluid life of the person commiting those acts. It probably has a balance of sorts, leading you deeper into his life but without blantently making it out to be just rape and murder. I could be wrong, but i don't see how it could be so popular, and withstand any assaults from the governemnts if it didnt.

It's a novel, a book. On the internet, if it is written firstly here, it's text. Books are, I figure almost impossible to stop or impose guidelines on. It's more on finding distributors and such that's the difficulty. Though, for American Pyscho, I wonder, if he had raped a child, would it have been so accepted? When it comes to children, the people in power go tunnel vision to what is right and what isn't right. No matter how it goes, fantasy or otherwise. It'd be very hard to impose their views on books, but here, on the internet, where it's literally a Mind of it's own, there are no police really, and no laws. So.. they can attack things. it's not solid either, it's data, easily deletable. Not like burning a book.

Another thing that hurts is short stories depicting raping of minors. You don't really get to indepth, and if you do, you're restricted to a short bubble of intensity. Try subjecting someone who is in power to a 50 page story of pure expression on such a deep level. In my views, they probably read stories/books, that take them close to such depths, but tease them with those depths, and constantly have life lines to raise them back to the 'safety' normality they live in. Murders alot easier to jump out of. Sex is, well, it's not so in my opinon. Sex with a child, probably isn't even depicted properly for why it's wrong, more of so, it's just a sick scary thought that we know is wrong, but are truly afraid to look at the reasons for why it is. Granted you can say the reasons, but to let them fill your mind with the colour and flavour that those reasons touch with is another thing. I donno, they make no true sense, but they make sense, if you look through their system.

Also, it's a great + for them. Imagine saying "our law has over thrown the growing number of stories depicting the RAPE of CHILDREN, BDSM, ect" and all the lovable things that go against Jesus Christ and alll his teachings that have been twisted into a game of politics.

In their views, if you obliterate the expression of such things, that's one step closer to obliterating the entire acts of it. Expressing it so others can be subjected to it, is a step closer to increasing the acceptance of it. I don't agree with that at all, you can't stop questions and expressions, not if they truly are not harming someone. The internet should be a open ground for humanity, not a Zoo. It's just they don't like this form of expression so 'open' to everyone. And they have the power, so they're using it. They never are purely true to the understandings and applications of their words. They are selective, so, you get this. It's difficult to defend this though, when you have stories you are defending that are, as I read in a quote

">Let’s look at a story, ‘The Perils of Pauline at Christmas’. This story involves a man dressed as Santa raping and strangling a ten year old girl, and enjoying it. It is non-consensual, brutal and unashamedly paedophilic, and its only merit is that it is a good example of the kind of thing that I would rather not find on this website. "


and

>Let’s also consider a story called Our Fun With Little Crystal. This is a non-consensual story in which a pubescent girl is kidnapped from a playground, tortured, orally raped, asphyxiated and revived, presumably in preparation for a vaginal rape in a subsequent chapter. Terms like ‘her small, growing tits’ and ‘still playing with stuffed animals’ make it clear that the victim is underage. All the way through the words ‘little’ and ‘young’ are interspersed with language saying how much fun this is, and it is clear that the child will eventually be killed. The age of the girl is not mentioned, but we are left in no doubt that this is a particularly nasty piece of paedophilia. "

I wouldn't be defending that. I would be defending the authors ability to have the freedom to express his/her feelings/desires on pen/paper/text/drawings. However it comes out, they do envoke a reaction, and that is what authors/creators want. Some it might also be a way to let out feelings, and to see them for what they are, and better understand them, and enjoy them in a safe and natural way, without harming someone. Who knows. The defined subject matter? I have my reasons for it not being my thing. But I don't impose my reasons onto someone else, just because I truly do not agree with what it is . Unless someone is truly being harmed by it. On the internet, no one is forcing you to read stories like these. So the choice is yours to read them.

And if the schools have problems with children gaining access to these, spend 10 million dollars collecting data and creating filters so the children can be 'protected'.

Just an opinon.