I have posted one review. I believe that if you like someones work you should tell them about it. That said, some of the negative ones that I have recieved have pointed out typos etc. So they are constructive, in that they help you improve your story writing.

The reviews that I hate are the pointless ones that slate your work, but have no substance. E.G. Invitation to a Fetish Party recieved general favourable reviews, appart from one guy who gave me a poor rating because it reminded him of a childrens cartoon or something similar. (P.S. If you are reading this, perhaps a link would be nice so that I could form my own oppinion.).

I digress. The interesting thing about these caustic individuals is that when you click on their names, you find that they have not actually written anything themselves. I don't mind a poor review. Laura Feline has been giving honest reviews of my work for years. But then, she has written stacks and I feel that her oppinion has some weight. I saw a review recently where Parker gave a nice review. It turns out that Parker is one of the reviewees favourate authors and the positive review gave her a great deal of encouragement. But it is these sad little snipers who do not let us see their work, but proclaim venomous little rants, that serve no purpose than demoralizing tallented writers that should be actively ignored by any author. I like what I write, I enjoyed writing it and sharing it with others.

P.S. Loved Petrol Station. Well written, nice pace, good charactorisation.

Rubberwolf