With the over all debate on gun contro, the right for an individual to bear arm,s protect their family and themselves
I have nener owned a gun, I feel no need to, that is what the Policeare for,
However, as I read al these stories bout School Shooting, Mall shooting ect each incident or almost all of these incidents seem to invovle either semi automatic assault rifles or fully automatic assault rifles
I have no issue with those who wish to own guns, for hunting, and the like, but our fore father, who established the Constitution never had these type arms to deal with, semi assault or fully automatic assualt rifles to the best of my knowledge did NOT exist at that time
What I do have an issuewith is those who say "Owing an semi auntomatic Assault Rifle or Fully Automatic Assault Rifle is my righit, it is guaranteed in the Constitution" How, they did not exsist at the time the Document was created.
I see no reason, unlerss it is owned by a colector and the rifle has been disengaed, meaning it si a show piece only, it does not work, then eed for anyone to own any semi or fully automatic rifle or hand gun, I do not buy th argument, "I use it for hunting" why?? I have neverseem a Deer, Rabbit ectfre back, why do they need to use a semi or fully automatic assault rifle??
The weapon used in the Mall Shooting and VT last year if I am not mistakedn were noth semi or fully automatic rifles, what need is the need for ownership on the,e they are designed soley for the purposes of killing they were not desgined for hunting, If i ever go hunting, I do not need a rifle or gun that fires 30 rounda minute, to hunt Deer, or Rabbits or Birds
Aside from collectors and where they no longer work, I see no reason be it practical or not for anyond to own or their "Need to Own" an AK47, an Uzi,
would someone please explain to me then eed for someone to ow one ofthese that work that could be used, why do you need to own an operting semi or fully automatic rifle or hand gun that fires 30 round per mniute?? please enlighten me on the need fr ownership on these, and please offerm e something beyond "It is my right" becausethese did not exist when the Constitution was written so I do notr believethses type weapond were what our Fore Father had in mind when they wrote the Constitution, i firmly believe they had rifles in mind single shot or double barrel, but certainly not Uzi's AK47 or the lot