Just as well the world doesn't. How many tens of thousands have died just so a foreign country can be governed by Bush's puppets? (Between 79,155 and 86,244 at the time of writing - and that's just in Iraq*)

Bin Laden? Taleban? Saddam? All evil, granted. All better destroyed than left to their own devices, admitted. But do it honestly if you're going to. Don't use them as excuses for empire building. Kill Bin Laden, despite the money and help USA gave him, because of the World Trade Center, and destroy the Taleban because, despite US support and tolerance of their opium growing and the wicked treatment of Afghans, they overstepped the mark by (allegedly) allowing Bin Laden to hide in Afghanistan for a while. Kill Saddam because of the atrocities he committed against his own people, but not because he had WMDs (he didn't) or because he supported Bin Laden (he didn't! He'd have turned Bin Laden over in a trice if he could have).

And when you destroy a country's infrastructure, you're responsible for what happens afterwards. If you neglect to rebuild it, you'll pay the price.

Who has the most innocent blood on his hands? Bush, Bin Laden or Saddam?

TYWD

* Source Iraq Body Count - http://www.iraqbodycount.org/