Quote Originally Posted by nakdsub View Post
As a first time author, I was looking for constructive criticism for my first story. Instead my first critic was a person who gave me a 1 because he didn't like reading stories with an under age character. Now, in my synopsis, I mentioned the main character was 15 years old. If he didn't like reading these stories OK but to read it then give it a 1 for content is just ridiculous.
Apparently, he is an idiot.

My second critic really cut the story down saying it read like a children's book. Everyone has a right to their opinion but what gets me is that this person misspelled several words and used "to" instead of "too" in the revue. When I checked for stories written by this person there were zero. Isn't that always the way.
So far the rest of the revues have been very positive.
Please don't get me wrong, if you have legitimate and constructive criticism, I am always willing to learn.
Thanks.
I see that you are suggesting that poor grammar or bad spelling in a review negates the truth or accuracy of the review. This is one of the more asinine complaints I have ever read about a review.

I will note that your complaint contained the word "revues". I will also note that you seem to have difficulty knowing where to use a comma. You are, essentially, reviewing the review you are complaining about and displaying poor spelling and technical skills. Isn't that ironic?