Quote Originally Posted by gagged_Louise View Post
Yes, I'd agree that Obama, because he is the one young leading candidate and because of his iutstanding personal quialities, would have a go at breaking free of the age-old issues that have hung around since tjhe '60s: hippies vs "ordinary people", pacifism vs the army, the Bible vs a secular state, etc. The Republicans seem entrenched in those issues, invoking them any time, and that makes a lot of Democrat sympathizer define tehmselves that way too. Hillary doesn't seem to be the person who could push those issues aside either.

It will be interesting to see what happens next, of course Hillary still has a strong chance of winning in ten days and I don't think she and Obama would make a viable team as president and vice president.
I agree, for change maybe we need a new "age" like JFK was, new idea, new direction, my concern with Hillary is with Bill in thw White House, it will be basicly the same book but with a new cover
I thiknwhat peopleneed to understand and hopefully accpt is what Barack has been saying, you have to believe changei s possible and that is wil not happen overnight, everything that needs change has happened over thelast 8years, change will not in 2 months we need a change we need a new direction, we need a new "face"
This will be oneo f the most intrrsting Presidential Races in years, as they said it is the 1sttimei believe in many many years wheretheir is NO INCUMBENT runnig, making thisrace not only that more important but fat more intersting, that is unless Dick Cheeny desides to run at the last minute (yea right) he can name scooter libby as his vp choice LOL!!!