Quote Originally Posted by J-Go View Post
Well you both have, I think, made my point. You have proven you could do quite well on the Harvard or Cambridge debate club; you have a solid grasp on WWII history and the constitution and at least one language. ThisYouWillDo you and I share a suspicion of FDR’s motives…probably for different reasons. Our history teachers tell us here in the States he was trying to bail our country out of economic collapse and, of course the Great Depression was a nasty time for us here in the states…(FYI we do refer to ourselves as Americans but that’s not my point). Personally, all his good intensions aside, FDR ended up being the father of American social ism, of which the cost to this country makes the Great Depression look like a bargain. But hey there is a whole new thread!
My point is this, it’s a nice debate and everyone has gotten delightfully indignant and all but THEY ARE ALL STILL DEAD. And tomorrow more people will die somewhere else…so it goes. We can ban every gun on the planet and it won’t change a thing.
The point is missed entirely, I never intended this post to be about bannnig guns, my point has always been JUST semi automatci and full automitic assualit rife and semi automatic and fully automatic hand guns, i would love ANYONE in this forum to show m wher it say ALL GUNDS BE BANNED it was orginaly designed to ask simply with all the recent college and high school shooting,what do people thing shoulsd be done,
Rifle ownership for hunting yes, handgun ownership for protection yes if you so choose FULL AUTOMATIC ASSAULT RIFLE AND HANDGUNS FOR GNENERAL PUBLIX USE, NO AND WHY WOULD YOU NEED THESE 2 TYPE OF GUN FOR EVERYDAY USE, YOU DO NOT NEED A FULL AUTOMATIC GUN OR RIFLE TO HUNT

thank you