Earlier you said that this site was for sharing experiences, you have been a member since early March and made 37 posts, a third of those posts you have made today and have been directed at insulting, trying to insult or baiting me.

I wrote "BDSM is an ersatz experience so yes, it is sugarcoated. Take out SSC and consent and you have the real thing but you are less likely to get the real thing in the life style than outside it"

What is there to explain about that statement, it is self evident what it means and taken alone this statement is out of context because it implies criminal acts. If you read everything I wrote you will see the context in which it was made, plus a little defining with my excahnges with Aesop. As I have pointed out BDSMers are more aware of what they are doing and SSC and consent become self censoring boundaries. It makes little difference to my point, BDSM is sugarcoated, which was the whole point of the OP as far as I could tell and knowing the person who wrote the OP well I knew exactly where she was coming from.

Oh. And if the opening poster was around I would ask her permission to reveal how well I do know her to prove to you I know exactly where she was coming from!