Bush Indictment in Vermont

[John56{vg}]

that's anothing thing common to the neo-con apologists. Insulting everybody then complaining that THEY are the wrong ones.

I understand from your comments you do not have any back-up for your claims.

So be it. debate over I guess.

I assure you my reading comprehension is quite high. And at least I spell everything correctly. IT is Cheney not Chaney my friend.

[wmrs2]

that's anothing thing common to the neo-con apologists. Insulting everybody then complaining that THEY are the wrong ones.

I understand from your comments you do not have any back-up for your claims.

So be it. debate over I guess.

I assure you my reading comprehension is quite high. And at least I spell everything correctly. IT is Cheney not Chaney my friend.

Yes, I have always been a poor speller. That's why I use spell check but then I still seem to miss spell a few words. No one is perfect and few have perfect reasoning. The only one that I can think of is Jesus Christ.

The word anything is spelled "anothing" and "neo" is miss spelled according to my spell check or maybe it is how you use it. On the spell check Cheney is a miss spelling and Chaney is cited as correct spelling. Anyway, a lot of words would slip by me as being spelled correctly without my spell check. However, this makes you statement, "And at least I spell everything correctly" look sort of careless.

In your reply to me you failed to capitalize "that's" but I know you knew better, it was a simple mistake, not a lack of intelligence. I have made that mistake myself, so it would be unfair of me to tell you that at least I always used perfect grammar. I think it would also be rude. What do you think about it my friend?

[mkemse]

Yes, I have always been a poor speller. That's why I use spell check but then I still seem to miss spell a few words. No one is perfect and few have perfect reasoning. The only one that I can think of is Jesus Christ.

The word anything is spelled "anothing" and "neo" is miss spelled according to my spell check or maybe it is how you use it. On the spell check Cheney is a miss spelling and Chaney is cited as correct spelling. Anyway, a lot of words would slip by me as being spelled correctly without my spell check. However, this makes you statement, "And at least I spell everything correctly" look sort of careless.

In your reply to me you failed to capitalize "that's" but I know you knew better, it was a simple mistake, not a lack of intelligence. I have made that mistake myself, so it would be unfair of me to tell you that at least I always used perfect grammar. I think it would also be rude. What do you think about it my friend?

I learned sometime back that spell check is NOT 100% correct, so i would say let's not blame anyone, it simply is not worth the debate every post i have ever read and even stories on this site all have miss spelled words it is called human error and we are all humans, and i do the best i can i suffer for dyslexia so i have no faith in spell check at all yes many of my words are mispelled i will admit to that, but i at least try to get my point acorss at the expenses of embarasing myslef, i certainly hope that is the least issue i have to deal with the rest of my life it surebeats long and

[wmrs2]

I learned sometime back that spell check is NOT 100% correct, so i would say let's not blame anyone, it simply is not worth the debate every post i have ever read and even stories on this site all have miss spelled words it is called human error and we are all humans, and i do the best i can i suffer for dyslexia so i have no faith in spell check at all yes many of my words are mispelled i will admit to that, but i at least try to get my point acorss at the expenses of embarasing myslef, i certainly hope that is the least issue i have to deal with the rest of my life it surebeats long and

mkemse, I always want to be polite to you. But you have gone to far here in making excuses for your short comings. I am painfully aware that spell check is not 100% correct but is still much better than you or I spell. You do not do the best you can or you would use spell check and grammar check if it is on you CP. You can hardly read what you write because you do not honor any of the laws of grammar.

I know you can do better because I have read some things you have written and these have been excellent. The kind of mistakes you make are not due to dyslexia but carelessness.

A friend asking you to try harder.

[wmrs2]

John56 is worried also that I do not have a backup for may claims. In America a public education is provided for all citizens, in theory at least. Much of what we talk about is considered common knowledge, such as we all know it is a fact that George Washington was our first president. I can not tell you what book this common knowledge came from, yet, commonly educated people have no problem with accepting this fact when I present it as such. However, in a history class, a strange behaving student argued that Benjamin Franklin was the first president. That caused an argument and, in that case, the teacher asked this strange behaving person to provide documentation to back up his theory. He did. The teacher disagreed but acknowledged there was some truth or facts to backup his belief that Ben was the first president. A few facts, however, do not make an acceptable theory; all we students went on believing that G. W. was the first president.

I don't need to respond to everything with documentation for you to understand the truth about most common things in American history. We Americans have a public, common education. We know common facts. Having gone through the 8th grade in school, there is nothing that has been in this debate that you should not understand from an 8th grade education level. If there are words and terms that you do not understand, Google it.

By the way, Liberals in politics is a relative new animal. It has been a long time ago but I don't remember my 8th grade teacher mentioning Liberal as an American political term. The first time I really noticed Liberals was in the election of 1968. All I know is that the Liberals did not want to be called Liberal. For some reason those who were branded as Liberals were quickly beaten. It seemed that most people thought Liberals were Communist sympathizers.

Today most of the vocal Democrats are Liberals and make no bones about it. I never have had a Liberal tell me what they believe that makes them a Liberal. Maybe you can tell me philosophically what a Liberal Democrat is. Do Liberals have a strange logic that puts them at odds with our national history? If so,explain it to me. I am listening and I promise not to require a long list of sources. If I disagree on a point, I will Google for my self. If you are a certain mindset, say so. What are the advantages of being a Liberal? Does being a Liberal make you more patriotic or does it have anything to do with that?

By the way, you ought to do yourself a favor and read a little more about theories. You will learn that a theory is many things depending on whether you are working in science, history, physics, sociology, medicine or just normal every occurrences. Coming from various theories are laws. Evolution is probably the most talked about theory in America. It is really important to theories in medicine but not so important to theories in politics. Some theories are so well accepted that they become laws, such as the law of gravity. We depend on this law very much every time we get up to go to work. We do not take time to document each time we leave home.

[mkemse]

John56 is worried also that I do not have a backup for may claims. In America a public education is provided for all citizens, in theory at least. Much of what we talk about is considered common knowledge, such as we all know it is a fact that George Washington was our first president. I can not tell you what book this common knowledge came from, yet, commonly educated people have no problem with accepting this fact when I present it as such. However, in a history class, a strange behaving student argued that Benjamin Franklin was the first president. That caused an argument and, in that case, the teacher asked this strange behaving person to provide documentation to back up his theory. He did. The teacher disagreed but acknowledged there was some truth or facts to backup his belief that Ben was the first president. A few facts, however, do not make an acceptable theory; all we students went on believing that G. W. was the first president.

I don't need to respond to everything with documentation for you to understand the truth about most common things in American history. We Americans have a public, common education. We know common facts. Having gone through the 8th grade in school, there is nothing that has been in this debate that you should not understand from an 8th grade education level. If there are words and terms that you do not understand, Google it.

By the way, Liberals in politics is a relative new animal. It has been a long time ago but I don't remember my 8th grade teacher mentioning Liberal as an American political term. The first time I really noticed Liberals was in the election of 1968. All I know is that the Liberals did not want to be called Liberal. For some reason those who were branded as Liberals were quickly beaten. It seemed that most people thought Liberals were Communist sympathizers.

Today most of the vocal Democrats are Liberals and make no bones about it. I never have had a Liberal tell me what they believe that makes them a Liberal. Maybe you can tell me philosophically what a Liberal Democrat is. Do Liberals have a strange logic that puts them at odds with our national history? If so,explain it to me. I am listening and I promise not to require a long list of sources. If I disagree on a point, I will Google for my self. If you are a certain mindset, say so. What are the advantages of being a Liberal? Does being a Liberal make you more patriotic or does it have anything to do with that?

By the way, you ought to do yourself a favor and read a little more about theories. You will learn that a theory is many things depending on whether you are working in science, history, physics, sociology, medicine or just normal every occurrences. Coming from various theories are laws. Evolution is probably the most talked about theory in America. It is really important to theories in medicine but not so important to theories in politics. Some theories are so well accepted that they become laws, such as the law of gravity. We depend on this law very much every time we get up to go to work. We do not take time to document each time we leave home.

I already posted a very clear defination of Theory, a theory is an Assumption or Opinion it is NOT based on fact
Theories in medication are "It SHOULD Work" but no facts as of yet to prove they do most medication out are tiral Medicine as a Science Is not exact, i have eben toldthis by doctors and phramacists, if it where exact all medications prescribed would do as they are intendedm have you ever had a docotor say to you "Let's Try this, if it does not work, we will try someting else" i have seen nothing wtiten saying Science is exact if you have again please post proff, i do notr want THEORIES, Assumption, i want facts like i have posted
I live outside chicago my Theory is by June it will be around 70-80 degreee here during the day, that is a theory, an assumption, it will not be fact til it actualy happens