A defining question

[TomOfSweden]

I'm out... cos I can't stand debates where people choose to pick and choose at statments therefore removing all meaning from them...

I did? What statement did I ignore?

I dislike being told what i'm saying, when i'm fully aware of what i'm saying, and that i must be wrong because a bunch of other philosophers don't agree with me.

I didn't. I did suspected where your ideas came from, and refuted that source. If your source is another, then I was wrong.

If that's all your argument is based on... a majority vote... then it's a bit of a lame argument really...

erm.... what? In what way did I appeal to appeal to the majority?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_the_majority