Anti-American Protesters

[Ragoczy]

No, the argument wasn't explicit. I still think it was there.

So provide an example, otherwise the statement is useless rhetoric.

What does CCR have to do with anything? That was the audience, it's irrelevant. That's not what that video was about.

CCR is the source of the video. The source influences the content, just as in the video from the original post, and must be considered. CCR supports the UN Declaration on Human Rights, one of the most reprehensible documents on "rights" ever created. As such, their understanding of "rights" is rather limited.

Maybe this will sit better with you, unless you think Congress has no fundamental understanding of Constitutional law

The US Congress has no fundamental understanding of the US Constitution. This has been an established fact since the first entitlement program and has been getting steadily worse.

The use of chemical weapons is a war crime regardless of the target, intended or not. Most of the victims were insurgents. They didn't hide that fact. They didn't have to.

By the definition presented in the video, all explosives would be considered chemical weapons. Further, you're relying a freakin' YouTube video here -- where's the documentation of the source and that the guy speaking isn't some freak living in his mom's basement?