
Originally Posted by
gagged_Louise
That the United Nations declaration of human rights is an abhorrent document - well, you're entitled to your view of course.
http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html
I draw your attention to Article 29(3):
"These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations."
If your exercising your rights is contrary to the purposes of the UN, you can't do it. I find this abhorrent.
It's the argument of natural vs. granted rights. The US Constitution does not grant rights, it grants power to government. The enumeration of rights is considered a recognition, not a grant. The difference is that a granted right may be revoked by the granter, whereas a natural right is inherent in the individual.
The UN takes a wholly granter approach to human rights, with no recognition of natural rights. Therefore, the UN reserves to itself the power to violate the rights of the individual if their exercising that right is contrary to the UN's purpose.