Quote Originally Posted by Shwenn View Post
I apologize but I don't have enough faith in your intellectual honesty to pursue this.
Okay, so from my perspective this part of the exchange has gone something like:

You: "I think this video you've posted is ultra conservatives resorting to petty logical falacies [sic]."

Me: "There weren't any fallacies, logical or factual, presented by the makers of the film ..."

You: "No, the argument wasn't explicit. I still think it was there."

Me: "So provide an example, otherwise the statement is useless rhetoric."

You: "I apologize but I don't have enough faith in your intellectual honesty to pursue this."

A fallacy, by definition, is explicit.

Factual: Bob said X ... X is wrong ... here's the proof.
Logical: Bob said X and Y ... these do not make logical sense ... here's why.

You make a blanket statement that there are multiple fallacies then refuse to provide a single example of one. This smacks of demagoguery and perhaps it's you who should examine your intellectual honesty?