Changes in the American Tax System

[Ragoczy]

Lie #1: taxes would be voluntary under the FairTax. In his discussion of the origins of the FairTax, Boortz says that the AFFT sought "a method of taxation that would be totally voluntary, that would allow all citizens to pay what they choose, when they choose, by how they choose to spend their money." Boortz has the audacity to say that "there is nothing coercive about the FairTax." It is "a truly voluntary tax system." The government should allow you to "keep your money in an investment account of some kind, earning interest for you, until you decide to pay taxes to the federal government." The FairTax would allow people to "judge for themselves when and how they're comfortable making taxable purchases."

The concept of the "voluntary" quote is clearly laid out in the book and taking the phrases of a sentence out of context doesn't make your point true. It is voluntary in the sense that an individual is free to make the choice to buy something at the retail level and pay taxes on it or to save and invest the money tax free. I think everyone can comprehend the concept of buying the candy bar and paying tax or saving the money and not.

Lie #2:the FairTax rate would be 23 percent. Throughout the book, Boortz gives the FairTax rate as 23 percent. It is not until near the end of the book—in the chapter, "Questions and Objections"—that he admits it is really 30 percent. But even then he still insists it is 23 percent.

Those of us who were skeptical from the beginning noticed this when we got to page 84. There Boortz used the example of a single mother with two children spending $45 a week on groceries. He claims that the removal of the taxes currently embedded in the price would lower the cost of the groceries to $35.10 (a dubious proposition). But then he says: "Add the FairTax, and the groceries would cost $45.58. I learned in the sixth grade that if an item cost $35.10, and I add to it $10.48 in sales tax, then I paid a tax rate of almost 30 percent—not 23 percent. Boortz says in the "Questions and Objections" chapter that "critics of the FairTax have a way of dwelling on this 30 percent figure." I wonder why? Although Boortz explains that he is using an exclusive rate rather than an inclusive rate to figure the percentage, his "mathematical equivalent of a game of semantics" still results in a FairTax rate of 30 percent. This is why Boortz prefers the national sales tax to be included in the price of each item—so the consumer doesn't realize that he is really paying an extra 30 percent in sales tax, not Boortz's new math amount of 23 percent.

This is a clever argument used by so many Fair Tax opponents who are either being deliberately deceptive or are unable to understand the difference between an inclusive or exclusive tax. You're comparing the Fair Tax to sales taxes in States that have an exclusive tax -- meaning that the tax is calculated outside of the total purchase price. The Fair Tax is not being compared to those taxes because it doesn't replace them, it's compared to the Income Tax, which is an inclusive tax -- meaning that the tax is calculated as part of the total. In order to have an apples-to-apples comparison, the Fair Tax rate is calculated inclusively so that it can be compared to the current Income Tax rates. (http://www.fairtax.org/site/PageServ...0107_bartlett3)

Here's the difference:

Buying a candy bar for a dollar and paying 6% sales tax is different from earning a dollar and paying 15% income tax. In the first instance, the total that changes hands is $1.06 -- that's the total of the transaction. In the second, the total is $1.00. Income Tax comes from the total.

Because the Fair Tax is being compared to the Income Tax, it's calculated the same way in order to provide a fair, clear means of comparison. By insisting that it be calculated differently from the Income Tax, you muddy the waters.

Lie #3: the FairTax would abolish the IRS. Boortz claims that his book is about transforming the nation by sending "one of its most hated institutions," the IRS, to "that place in the government guano heap of history." The goal of the FairTax is to "eliminate the IRS." Boortz even jokes about IRS agents working at a fast food restaurant after the FairTax is implemented.

Calling the IRS by another name doesn't mean that its functions will be eliminated. Just as the income tax will be replaced by the FairTax, so the IRS will be replaced by some other federal bureaucracy to oversee the collection of the FairTax. It should not be forgotten that the FairTax is a national sales tax. According to The Fair Tax Act of 2005:

Addressed in a previous post. Of course there has to be an enforcement and collection agency, but they don't have the power of today's IRS to audit and torment individual taxpayers, they don't have the pounds of regulations to learn before filing -- because they don't file anything.