Welcome to the BDSM Library.
  • Login:
beymenslotgir.com kalebet34.net escort bodrum bodrum escort
Results 1 to 21 of 21

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    littlebooofdoom
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    353
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by mkemse View Post
    Obama may not a any better then Bush has been, but we DO KNOW that McCAin will be thes ame, his voting records shows his allience to Bush & his Policies he voted for them 95% of the time
    That is a bunch of BS.

    We DON'T KNOW that McCain will be the same. His voting records that were taken, I highly doubt that was based over all of the topics and polices of Bush. Stats are taken and manipulated to be used as "the truth" and taken "true parts" but not paired up right, therefore they are lies.

    Obama's campaign people are PROS at doing this.
    ____________

    Today I shall be witty, charming and elegant.
    Or maybe I'll say "um" a lot and trip over things.

    "Sentor Obama, I am not President Bush. You wanted to run against President Bush, you should have run four years ago." - McCain

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    2,311
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by hopperboo View Post
    That is a bunch of BS.

    We DON'T KNOW that McCain will be the same. His voting records that were taken, I highly doubt that was based over all of the topics and polices of Bush. Stats are taken and manipulated to be used as "the truth" and taken "true parts" but not paired up right, therefore they are lies.

    Obama's campaign people are PROS at doing this.
    Why is the bunch off bull, looking at McCains voting record it is public record, he has voted in support of Bush's Policies 95% of the time check his voting record that will show itself

    he is only now bshing Bush (Mccian) because e us trailing in the Polls, not to mention how scary it is know Sarah Palin could end up as Pres. if McCain wins and has health issues

    btw this is also public record, her own paper the Alaska Tribune Alaska's largest newapaper, on par with the size and circulation of the Chicao Tribune, Washington Post ect this last Sunday even endorsed Obama say she is to risky to take a chance on, i even posted his endorsment in the forums as amatter of record prr googe it to verify it.

    Christopher Buckley the son of the Late Right Wing Columnist Willism F. Buckley Jr, Saturday also endorsed Obama, he then resigned his postion with the National Review overthe endorsement, Colin Powell endorsed Obama samereason, to may concenrs over Palins ability he father must be turinig in his grave and the Chicago Tribune one of te most conservative Papers in America endorsed Obamam, this is th first time in it's history that thery have endorsed a Democratic Nominee for President

  3. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    2,311
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by hopperboo View Post
    That is a bunch of BS.

    We DON'T KNOW that McCain will be the same. His voting records that were taken, I highly doubt that was based over all of the topics and polices of Bush. Stats are taken and manipulated to be used as "the truth" and taken "true parts" but not paired up right, therefore they are lies.

    Obama's campaign people are PROS at doing this.
    June 13, 2008
    Q: Is it true John McCain voted with George Bush 95 percent of the time?
    The Obama campaign keeps claiming McCain has voted with President Bush 95 percent of the time. Is this true? Is this significant?
    A: Yes, it's true, according to Congressional Quarterly's assessment of McCain's voting record.
    Sen. Barack Obama has attempted to use the Arizona senator's voting record against him in statements like this:

    Barack Obama (June 3): It's not change when John McCain decided to stand with George Bush 95 percent of the time, as he did in the Senate last year.

    The claim is true. According to Congressional Quarterly's Voting Studies, in 2007 McCain voted in line with the president's position 95 percent of the time – the highest percentage rate for McCain since Bush took office – and voted in line with his party 90 percent of the time. However, McCain's support of President Bush's position has been as low as 77 percent (in 2005), and his support for his party's position has been as low as 67 percent (2001).

    Democrats are, of course, attempting to make the case that a vote for McCain is a vote to continue the policies of Bush, whose approval ratings are, to put it charitably, not a political asset for McCain.


    The was posted on the Annenberg potical web site, a PRO Busg web site i just goggled it it is called The Annenberg Fast Track, as Conservative think tank,
    so my post is fact based on public voting record and not number manipulation record not on just what Obama is claiminig

    http://www.factcheck.org/askfactchec...oted_with.html - 15k -

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Members who have read this thread: 0

There are no members to list at the moment.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Back to top